My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 01/09/85
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
PC 01/09/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:59:24 AM
Creation date
4/23/2007 4:47:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/9/1985
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 01/9/85
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commissio. <br />January 9, 1985 <br />Resolution No. 2590 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of Case PUD-84-19 subject to the conditions shown in the staff <br />report. <br />A motion was made that the findings shown in the staff report are <br />made and that Case UP-84-65 be approved subject to the conditions <br />shown therein. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Getty, Innes, Lindsey, Wellman and <br />Vice Chairman Wilson <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Chairman Doherty <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2591 was entered and adopted approving Case <br />UP-84-65 as motioned. <br />PUD-84-21, EVH Partnership <br />Application of EVH Partnership and the Roman Catholic Bishop of <br />Oakland for PUD zoning and development plan approval of a 262 <br />unit multi-family residential development and related facilities <br />on an approximately 13 acre site located immediately southwest of <br />Bernal Avenue (extension) and the Southern Pacific right-of-way. <br />The property consists of approximately 8 acres currently within <br />the City limits and approximately 5 acres currently outside of <br />the City limits for which this action shall constitute a <br />prezoning. The Planning Commission may recommend any action on <br />this matter consistent with the General Plan. A negative <br />declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommend approval of the <br />project. He reviewed the past history of previous application <br />for the property. Further the City received today a letter from <br />the San Francisco City and County Water Department asking that <br />this matter be postponed. Mr. Howell has been in contact with <br />Mr. Jensen of SFWD today and Mr. Tandy Carter is present to <br />represent SFWD. <br />Commissioner Lindsey asked about the possible ingress and egress <br />to Sunol Boulevard. Mr. Warnick indicated that the staff <br />addressed this matter in their report and doesn't feel that at <br />this time it is necessary and that it can be done at a later <br />time. Commissioner Lindsey asked why it is not important now to <br />have it completed. Mr. Warnick explained that the railroad <br />tracks is in the way and will probably remain for another one to <br />two years. The project does not have access to Sunol at this <br />time. The applicant is in agreement that if it appears necessary <br />at a later time, they will be willing to accomplish the <br />connection. <br />Vice Chairman Wilson asked if Bernal Avenue isn't built out how <br />the connection would be made. Mr. Warnick stated that the new <br />street will be built up passed the Police Department. Access <br />would now be through New Bernal Avenue. Commissioner Innes asked <br />- 5 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.