Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Planning Commission <br />Tuesday, November 25, 1986 <br />has done a good job in attaining its goal of 75% single-family vs <br />25% multiple housing goal. <br />Commissioner Michelotti complemented the developers on this <br />project. <br />Commissioner Wellman stated because of her recent experience with <br />the Federal government in the Post Office approval, she would <br />support staff's recommendation in Condition No. 24. She would, <br />perhaps, entertain a modification to the condition, but not to <br />have it deleted entirely. <br />Commissioner Innes alluded to the fact that there are other <br />projects waiting in the wings. He felt whatever was done on this <br />project would set a precedent. Commissioner Innes stated that if <br />the Commission entertains a modification to Condition No. 24, it <br />should say "...all approvals have been received." The <br />Commissioners then discussed modification of Condition No. 24 in <br />various forms. <br />The time frame for Caltrans and federal government approvals was <br />then discussed by the Commissioners. <br />Chairman Lindsey felt that once the City as received federal <br />approval and the environmental document is finaled, it would be <br />reasonable to expect that the interchange would be constructed. <br />Chairman Lindsey suggested that Condition No. 24 be modified to <br />reflect constructed can commence once federal and environmental <br />document approval have been completed. <br />Commissioner Michelotti stated that if Condition No. 24 is <br />removed, she would not support the project. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Wellman, seconded by <br />Commissioner Hoyt to recommend approval of the Negative <br />Declaration prepared for Case PUD-81-22-1M as project approval <br />would have an insignificant effect on the environment. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Hoyt, Innes, Michelotti, Wellman and <br />Chairman Lindsey <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2867 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of the Negative Declaration prepared for Case PUD-81-22-1M as <br />motioned. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Wellman, seconded by <br />Commissioner Hoyt that Case PUD-81-22-1M be recommended for <br />approval subject to the conditions of the staff report, modifying <br />Condition No. 24 to allow building and grading permits upon <br />federal new connection and environmental document approval, and <br />that the carports be redesigned to have some with pitched roofs <br />- 6 - <br /> <br />