Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />Planning Commission <br />September 24, 1986 <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Hoyt, <br />Chairman Lindsey <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Innes, Michelotti, Wellman and <br />Resolution No. 2841 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of the development agreement for Koll Bernal Avenue Associates. <br />Traffic Computer Report <br />Mr. Quaglia presented the staff report. <br />Commissioner Innes stated that there appears to be no difference <br />in the traffic counts for November 1985 and April 1986. He felt <br />there should have been an increase in ADT during this time. <br />Discussion ensued concerning computer counts vs. actual physical <br />counts. Commissioner Innes suggested that the November physical <br />count be delayed until such time as the computer can give ADT. <br />Mr. Quaglia indicated that the empirical data is being stored and <br />work has to be done to retract the information from the computer. <br />Commissioner Innes felt the only way the information can be <br />validated is for the physical and computer count to be done at <br />the same time. If the computer is not ready to do this in <br />November, he would suggest it be put off until such time as both <br />of these counts can be done simultaneously. <br />Commissioner Michelotti wanted to make sure that the computer <br />computed peak hour traffic to make sure the peaks are as <br />discussed. <br />PUD 81 30 36D, Martin Company/Prudential Insurance Company <br />Application of the Martin Company and the Prudential Insurance <br />Company of America for design review approval to construct an <br />approximately 258,300 sq. ft. five-building, multi-tenant office <br />complex to be located on an approximately 18.7 acre site, located <br />generally in the area south of Stoneridge Drive, east of willow <br />Road, and west of Hacienda Drive. <br />Commissioner Innes said he looked at the building on First Street <br />in San Jose. He had no problems at all with the architecture of <br />the structure, but did not feel the brick chosen will match the <br />balance of the development. Commissioner Innes asked if the <br />staff could work with the developer to change the brick. <br />Mr. Quaglia pointed out that the brick shown is the brick the <br />developer wants to go with. <br />Commissioner Michelotti said that if there was any concern with <br />the material the project was to have been brought back for <br />review. She shared the same concern but was not able to get down <br />to San Jose to see the building. <br />- 8 - <br />_._ r <br />