Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Continued Planning Commission Meeting of 8/27/86 <br />Held on 9/3/86 <br />Parcel 23A - Lin <br />Ted Fairfield, representing the Lin family, indicated it is <br />preferred the property be developed LDR. They would opt for <br />Rural Density as long as the density is clarified. He asked that <br />the word "rural" be included in the 9/2/86 staff report as <br />follows: <br />"Residential..... Rural, Low or Medium Density.........Medium <br />Density and no limit for Rural, Low Density...." <br />Staff indicated they have no problem with this request. Mr. <br />Fairfield stated that five acre or one-half acre lots would be an <br />inappropriate use for the property. Medium Density and no limit <br />for Low and Rural Density would allow development to be where it <br />belongs. Mr. Lee said this was addressed in the policy section <br />of the 9/2/86 staff report. Mr. Fairfield did not agree that it <br />had been addressed. He felt the General Plan should represent <br />something to allow the maximum expanse of the land. <br />Mr. Fairfield addressed page two of the 9/2/86 staff report <br />relating to Page II-5 of the General Plan asking that the final <br />paragraph read as follows "All projects receiving PUD approval <br />prior to the adoption of this General Plan shall be considered in <br />conformance with the provisions of this plan." The word <br />"density's should be deleted. <br />Mr. Fairfield stated they agree with the General Plan alternative <br />for the Lin property. CFA would be their second choice. When <br />the time comes for serious development, they will request what <br />will amount to Low Density Residential. He asked that the <br />Commission please consider that what used to be called PH&S <br />implies one unit per five acres. Now the General Plan shows No <br />development on the entire area outside of Rural designation. <br />Vote: CFA - 5-0 <br />23B - Lund <br />Commissioner Innes expressed confusion with the recommendation <br />relating to this property. He asked how many units re currently <br />allowed. Mr. Lee said approximately 55 in LDR - 110 units total. <br />CFA adds another 25 units to that in the Rural designation for a <br />maximum of 135 additional units. <br />Vic Lund, 234 Main Street, supported alternative allowing the <br />maximum density. At some point they could consider high caliber <br />condominium type homes. <br />Chairman Lindsey addressed Medium Density Residential on 45 acres <br />which would allow 150+ units. Chairman Lindsey expressed concern <br />with Medium Density Residential because of the property were to <br />be sold, it might not be developed in the manner Mr. Lund has in <br />mind. <br />- 14 - <br />