Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />- -Planning Commission <br />May 14, 1986 <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of <br />design review for the first phase of the Koll Company business <br />park. <br />Terry Jacobson, Leason & Pomeroy Associates, stated he was <br />prepared to present a slide presentation if the Commission so <br />desired. The Commission indicated that due to the lateness of <br />the hour, the slide show could be foregone. Mr. Jacobson then <br />reviewed the architecture of the buildings showing the <br />Commissioner revised plans. Mr. Jacobson stated that all of the <br />conditions recommended in the staff report are acceptable to <br />them. <br />Commissioner Wellman asked about the multi-tenant building and <br />trellis and whether it would actually be used for a planter area. <br />Mr. Jacobson said this was not the intent. Commissioner Wellman <br />then likened the proposal to that at Stoneridge and West Las <br />Positas. Mr. Pogue alluded to the fact that the architecture, is <br />similar. He reviewed the rounded element of the proposal vs the <br />other structures. Comparisons were then made of the multi-tenant <br />buildings at Hacienda and this business park. <br />Commissioner Innes addressed the major entrances and asked if <br />there is glass in the doors other than the three defined <br />entrances. <br />Mr. Swift felt the proposed structures are a marked improvement <br />of the similar Koll buildings in Hacienda. <br />Commissioner Berger then discussed landscaping along the Arroyo <br />with Mr. Jacobson. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Wellman, seconded by <br />Commissioner Hoyt, that PUD-80-2-1D be recommended for approval <br />subject to the conditions of the staff report. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Berger, Hoyt, Innes, wellman and <br />Chairman Lindsey <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Michelotti <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2795 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of Case PUD-80-2-1D as motioned. <br />- 14 - <br />__ _ .. <br />