Laserfiche WebLink
Excer tp s of the Mir~~es Planning Commission Meeting of 2/12/86 <br />stories or higher. Chairman Wilson was in favor of deleting <br />these conditions because they are too great of anetcpewhech is <br />especially in view of the setbacks, landscaping, <br />better than any industrial developer has ever doneon topdofsthe <br />see how one can keep loading up costs, especially <br />assessment districts. The developments have produced a <br />significant income to the City and it can't be spent. The City <br />should get their own recreation. Chairman Wilson then asked the <br />Commissioners how many were in favor of deleting Condition 2f. <br />Three CommissionetherOMPD thererbeaad25% averagelonThisnmotionde <br />a motion that in <br />failed for lack of second. <br />Commissioner Michelotti wanted to know if it could be stated in <br />the minutes if at all possible the Commission would like to <br />encourage deck parking where feasible so that there is not <br />wall-to-wall asphalt in a project. Mr. Callahan indicated some <br />projects have been designed with structured parking. <br />Commissioner Hoyt stated that relating to Condition No. 28 the <br />applicant is willing to pay their fair share. Commissioner <br />Lindsey agreed that Condition No. 28 should be modified. <br />Chairman Wilson asked Mr. Swift if staff is satisfied with <br />Condition No. 28 as rewritten by the applicani~ isrdrafted. <br />responded staff is not happy with it the way <br />However, the way Mr. Callahan explained they wouTO-batalbasis,tis <br />pay their fair share in whatever fashion, on a p <br />available is a better way to draft. Staff doesn't currently have <br />the level of knowledge necessary to prWithttheedevelopersguage at <br />this time. The staff wanted a study, <br />participation, to include possible the funding mechanisms <br />Commissioner Lindsey said it is the Commission's desire to have <br />some contribution from the developers for recreation facilities <br />as it is needed. The existing ones will become so crowded they <br />can't be used. Increased use will come out of the industrial and <br />commercial users. He could live with Condition No. 28 as written <br />by staff. Chairman Wilson asked if ways to resolve the <br />recreation problem have been explored. After further discussion <br />the staff was directed to ascertain the ways to spread of the <br />cost of the recreation facilities. <br />Commissioner Michelotti asked about Condition No. 20, Truck <br />Traffic. She asked that someone respond to the problem at <br />Hopyard/I-580. Mr. Callahan indicated they are trying to work <br />out an agreement with the County and Caltrans concerning an <br />interim truck route using the abandoned SPRR right-of-way. <br />- 9 - <br />