Laserfiche WebLink
A motzon wss maoe by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by <br />Lommzsszoner Berger that the Negative Declaration prepared for <br />Tract 5935 be approved inasmuch as project approval would nave <br />an insignificant adverse effect on the environment. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Bereer, <br />and Chairman Lindsey <br />WOES: None <br />ABSENTh None <br />A8STAIN: None <br />Hoyt~ <br />Michelottl, Tarver, <br />Resolution No. PC-87-121 was entered and adopted approving the <br />Negative Declaration as motioned. <br />Commissioner Hoyt stated that he was comfortable with Phase l of <br />the project, but not with Phase 2. He felt it was unfair or <br />existir,g residents to be penalized as far as privacy is <br />concerned. He felt that at least one lot between five and <br />eleven should be eliminated and that a minimum setback should be <br />5C feet- He suggested that on the remaining lots there should <br />be no elevated decks on any slope with no altering of the slope. <br />He felt it was unfair to change the terrain so dramatically <br />behind existimp residences. Unless these areas were chanoed, he <br />felt he could not support the application- <br />Commissioner Tarver agreed with Commissioner Hoyt. He thoudht <br />the applicawi had attempted to work with the residents' <br />concerns, dut felt more work had to be done. In addition, he <br />soggesten the applicant loo* at different grading and lot <br />configeratiors or Phase 2. <br />Commissioner Seeger had the same concerns about the lots~ but <br />was unsure of a solution. She agreed with Commissioner Hoyt, <br />and in addition, did not like the idea of the soundwaIl between <br />Iots 54 and 60. She thought there should be more mitagation <br />measures, particularly on lots, 7, B, and 9. <br />Commissioner Miehelottz commented that she did not care for the <br />soundwall, but that she would leave that up to the staff. She <br />was comfortable enough witn Phase but felt the overall <br />project hao to be considered at this time' <br />Chairman Lindsey stated that he felt Phase 2 is a very dramatic <br />intrusion on existing property owners, and that based on the <br />plan as presented now, he would have to deny the application. <br />f".2, motion was made by Commissioner Hoyt~ seconded by Commissioner <br />Tarver denying Tract 5B35 for the reasons stated. <br />Page 6 <br />- -- r <br />