My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/24/87
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
PC 11/24/87
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:09:03 AM
Creation date
4/19/2007 4:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/24/1987
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/24/87
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution P[-37-127 was entered and adopted recomm di <br />approveI of the Negative Declaration as motioned. en ng <br />Commissioner Berger had no concerns with the <br />retail center; she stated that she is restaurant and <br />increased traffic; she was also concerned concerned with the <br />hour operation but understood the Company's the proposed 24 <br />would be in favor of the fuel truck '/y point of view. She <br />am~ She expressed great concern about unloading from ll pm to <br />with the jail being so near and n out the ���e of beer and wine <br />project if that went through, said she could not support the <br />Commissioner Hoyt was <br />that since alcoholic <br />Longs Drugstore that <br />unfounded <br />in favor <br />beverages <br />some of <br />of the entire project and felt <br />already available at the <br />concerns expressed were <br />were <br />Commiseions-r Tarver stated that he could supoort the restaurant <br />�,� retail Part o; the operation, but that he had �n <br />che traffic increase and that he could not support about <br />selling bear and wine with 24 hour operation. ppor a gas station <br />Commissioner Nzcnelotti was opposed to the sale o f b <br />with the 24 hour operation of the gae st � eer and wine <br />support the retail store and the restaurant �c �n~ She could <br />de an asset to the City~ n an� felt that would <br />Chairman Lindsey cou�d see no real problem with the sale f b <br />~d �~i'` e � �n� +e�� that potential problems ���h the re <br />lo e�r <br />..,� �� rom ±he nearby �ail would �e �ll i ea�e of <br />location of ��e new faczlity. His <br />i e« eced w��h the <br />increased traffic and felt ho ` pr �e concern was the <br />� could not support the appliapplication. «mtil the reioc8tzor of McD <br />onaid's. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner 8e <br />Comm�ssjcmer Tarveo denying Case pU�-8�-15rger, seconded by <br />concerns ci±ed, o�cause of the <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />Commissioners Berger, Michelotti T�rver <br />Chairman Lindsey � ' <br />Commissioner Hoyt <br />Nome <br />Nnne <br />Resotion No. PC-87-128 ��r�~�= and `^_-^_� denying entered adopted Case <br />-80 -15 -5D as motioned. <br />end <br />Thencapplicant was informed that he had 15 days to appeal to City <br />Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.