My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/24/87
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
PC 11/24/87
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:09:03 AM
Creation date
4/19/2007 4:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/24/1987
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/24/87
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
about fcur points he would like to discuss' <br />was his recollection that the cul-de-sacs <br />curbs and gutters' Mr' Swift stated that thi <br />approved' by the City Engineer. In regard t <br />would like the City Engineer to have the <br />Regarding Condition 35~ he hoped that the City <br />work �fne rather than have the developer <br />Condition dealt with the drainage system <br />had eolutione that would demonstrate no need <br />On Condition 16 it <br />would have rolled <br />s already had been <br />Condition 34- ne <br />final approval. <br />would pay for the <br />foot that <br />He thought they <br />+or Condition 36. <br />He ha� no concerns with Condition 37 presented tonight by Mr. <br />Bwift. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Commissioner Mic/`eIotti asked Mr. Swift if be had any comment <br />reeeerUing Condition 35' Mr' .L:;wzft said the area of the Arroyo <br />JP la Laguna bank haid eroded and the Czty was concerned that the <br />sewer line would Le in danger if further eroding was done; hence <br />the need for the condition' <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Berger, seconded oy <br />Com»iesioner Michelotti recommending approval of Case Tract 5848 <br />subject to the conditions of the staff report and with the <br />inclusion of Conditlon 37 as presented' <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />WOE. <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />Commiseioners <br />Chairman Lindsey <br />Commissioner Tarver <br />None <br />None <br />Berger, <br />Resoletion No' PC-27-125 was <br />Tract 5848 as motioneo. <br />enteree <br />Michelotti_ and <br />aro adopted approving <br />Chairman Lindsey asked the audience if there were anyone to <br />repreeent the application regarding the Downtown Pleasanton <br />boundary. Several hands were raised. He stated that <br />application would now be acted upon~ Commissioner Michelott1 <br />excused herself because of conflict of interests. Commissioner <br />Mahern teok her position. <br />Application of the Pleasanton Community Development Agency for <br />selection of a Project Area boundary and approval of a <br />Preliminary Plan for Downtown Pleasanton. <br />Mr. Swift presented the report recommending the adoption of the <br />attached dra+t resolution. <br />Chairman Lindsey asked Mr. Swift if. there would be an <br />opportunity for public input on this issue. Mr. Swift responded <br />there would be numerous public hearings, environmental impact <br />reports and various other opporturzties for infermatiom. <br />10 <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.