Laserfiche WebLink
Jett Walker, Pleasanton Meadows Haneowners' Association, 3420 Windsor Ct., <br />suggested that, with the assured commercial development of this land, this <br />represents a reascnabie canpranist and he is willing to go along with the <br />application, Tt-ere are sane concerns with the possibility of an external PA <br />system and with the freeway sign. <br />Chairperson Tarver asked it a limitation on tsars-ot-operation would calm any <br />concerns with a PA system. Mr. Wabcer said the system itself would be a nuisance. <br />Norma ICeily, 3923 Fairlands Orive, Pleasanton Meadows Homeowners' Association, <br />said she was hat noticed of this and she abj~rcts to a rental facility. It belongs on <br />the other side of the freeway with other car uses. <br />James Miller, 36b~b Camels Ct. , is opposed to anything that has to do with the <br />storage of gas tanks or pumps or the steam cleaning of cars. Signs should be <br />limited to building signs with no tree-standing signs. Would there be any car <br />painting vn the premises? why has the city bought the adjacent ~operty to <br />facilitate MacDonaid's? <br />P'~'. Swift clarified that the City bought the adjacent property ur-der the <br />assu~-tion that it would scccxnodate the freeway on-ramp. Cal-Trans then <br />located the ramp throte~ MaCDonald's. it is unclear it MacDonald's will relocate on <br />this property. Their preliminary assesxnent is that the location Is too small. <br />In respd-se to a questia- from Chairperson Lindsey, Mr. Swift noted that it <br />hacpataid's does relocate, the mater will be the subject of public hearings and <br />the public and the Commission will have future oppa'tunity "to address the issue. <br />In response to a questia- from Commissia~er Michelotti, Mr. Swift noted that the <br />signage was part of this application. <br />Jan Papp~ , 3917 Fairtar~ls Drive, ~scusaed the development history of the site <br />and said she doesr-'t ever n~r~ember receiving notice until this time. A residential <br />location is inappropriate for this busMess. The 2,000 sq~re toot building is too <br />small to do maMtenance insick so the maintenance and related activities probably <br />will be done outside and further degrade the area. Noise could be a nuisance <br />factor. The root doesn't blend with the area There would be difficulty with <br />policing this project. Notification was insuttlclent. Fairlands Terrace was not <br />notified. 'The population of north Pleasanton is unaware and uninformed of this <br />project.' <br />Planning Commission <br />Minutes 4 July 22, 1987 <br />~__ __... _ - - - r <br />