Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Swift then presented a graph showing actual growth rate with a 1996 <br />population benchmark of 62,000 and noted the reasonable scen~to of actual <br />but ld-out. <br />Commissta~er Mict-eiotti asked for ciaritlcatton of the chart numbers as being <br />equivalent to buiiding permits. <br />Mr. Swift cltrlF~d that the rwmbe~'s were a measure of sctuai construction. <br />Mr. Swat sl~o said that Stan recwrorNnds the maximum of 1,000 units ss being <br />satisfactory but Staff does not recommend the 62,000 benchmark or the the 500 <br />person limit for the San Francisco pro,~ect. <br />Chairperson ltndsey t~uestioned the mix and noted that Statt's recommendation is <br />soniewh~ dittere~ ft'o~n Ctty cout'iCti's. Pur-t to the Generai Plan, 260-650 <br />units per year covtd Ae awaib~le wtth e~aaaPtMns allowable up to a maximum <br />combined total of 1,404 units per year. <br />Commissioner Miclleietti qu~esttoned vrhat appeared to be a discrepancy M unit <br />numbers. Mr. Swift clarified and noted that the ntxrtbers of units were in <br />agreement. <br />C bAer Tarver gue~sttened ti-e n<errber of exeir~tions antictpated over the <br />next 8 years. Mr. Swift replied that 'e are Currentiy 2 Large projects with <br />exemption Potential. There slso coup! be e~nptiAns for high density projects and <br />for same re~tveiy srr~sii pro,~ects. At feast 350 exemptions per year could be <br />absorbed. <br />Commi~Nmer Tarvbr aMceO if lfwre waa any ~ the City quid employ to <br />reduce the rate. i~r. SwKt ~~ that the City cast affect PrMr <br />agreements. On#y a very i ~piber of uMta could be delatred. Any significant <br />r~ctien fta' approved prejec~s woad be vw~y dwticu~t, tt net impossttNe. <br />The pllbitc hearN~ was opened <br />Geoff Finite, 4322 Falriands OrNre, prssident of the Pleasanton Chamber of <br />Corrrnerce, fired the official t~nnbet' position on this matter. The Ctty should <br />limit gr- to that wh~h Is s~portable by the tntrastructure. There is concern <br />regarding the extension of Stoneridge Drive and the extension of Old Bernal <br />Avenue. The Chamber strongly supports the Statt recommendation and urges the <br />Commission to make that recommendation to the City Council. <br />Minutes 3 July 8, 1987 <br />