Laserfiche WebLink
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COP'M"11SSIONER MICHELOTTi, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />HOYT, THAT THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR CASES <br />PUD-81-30-19M/PUD-85-8-3M BE RECOi~hIDED FOR ADOPTION INASMUCH AS <br />PROJECT APPROVALS WOULD HAVE AN INSIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE <br />ENVIROMIENT. <br />AYES: Commissioners Berger, Hoyt, Michelotti, Tarver, and Chairperson <br />Lindsey <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />RESOLUTION N0. PC-87-86 WAS ENTERED AND ADOPTED RECOi"N"IENDiNG APPROVAL <br />OF THE t~6ATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR CASES PUD-81-30-19M/PUD-85-3M <br />AS MOTIOI~D. <br />Commissioner Michelotti is concerned with the change in priority regaling the <br />Santa RitalHactenda improvements and wouldn't support this application because <br />of the switch even though she had no problem with the rest of the application.. <br />Chairperson Lindsey was comfortable because of the LOS limitation. <br />Commissioner Tarver wanted to avoid getting to a high LOS. <br />A MOT ION WAS MADE BY COM'11 SSIONER BERGER, SECONDED BY CHAIRPERSON <br />LIt~SEY, TO RECOi"~''~NO APPROVAL OF CASES PUD-81-30-19M/PUD-85-8-3M AS <br />RECOM"IEt~ED iN THE STAFF REPORTS. <br />AYES: Commissioners Berger, Hoyt, and Chairperson Lindsey. <br />NOES: Commissioners Michelotti and Tarver <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />RESOLUTION N0. PC-87-87 WAS ENTERED AND ADOPTED REC01'1"IENDING APPROVAL <br />OF CASES PUD-81-30-19M/PUD-85-8-3M AS MOTIONED. <br />Minutes 19 July 8, 1987 <br /> <br />