PC 01/11/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

i1. deferred far future study; :-treed to talF to homeowners. 12. Plo apposition. 13. Pdo ;spposi ti on to ~'E-rase ~. 14_ P.~o opposition. 1.:,. Pao opposition; an assess,Trerrt district wain d be formed and a era rata share would be assessed to de;Jelapers and that any coming i n after the fart woa_aI d bu;{ i n i n same fashion . i6. Commissioner Havingh wished to add that egress and ingress to Stoneridge rJrive shotald be greater than i!4 of a mile to ensure free flacroing traffic. Commissioner 1-lavingh e~;pressed same cancern shout the 'sand usage for Staples Ranch. He said he arras t: ery nerr.Foa_as about Staneri dge L~r i ve and ha~.ra ng si ~; I apes at 45 mi I es an hour. He understood the need for that, but felt very uncomfortable about approving something Ii~-e that. Cotr,r::i ssi over Berger said she supports the c#-,ange to I i qht industrial; supports medium density residential orr the west piece of Staple Ranch property; sa_apports recamsrrendaticn far the property facing Trener}r I7ri~/e to tse loan density{ and to face Trener-y and not be accessed from Storceridge Brive. S!-:e uuppor is the current alignment of Staneridge on the Specific Flan and feels i t does not create a ta_annel effect. She can basi cal 1 }_~ support the plan. Commi ssi over Hoyt said he ~~aul d support the plan on an i ntel I ectual I e~: eI knowing that i t i s a necessity, ba_at i s not comf ortatl e with i t on ari emotional I etsel . CE'rai rr-nan s 1i chel otti recounted some background of Stoneri dge ~jr i ve and the p I an baba nd i t . She spaF;e of ttae design of the Chu property and e;:pressed concern about high der:sity. She felt more study was needed on that matter and felt that methaam density wotald be better. She felt that possibly high density oaraner-occupied townhoi_ases e~oui d be appropriate on the !''tol i nano property and ar~ould like that considered versa_as apartments. She thought there might be need for soundwalls on both sides of Stoneridge give depending upon what the sta_adv concludes. Regardirrg the retail commercial, she thought that airport inpa_at would ha•re to be studied more carefully. Commi ssi cr:err Ho•: i ngh and Hob; t f a•r€~red h< gh density Jn the G~ ~u property. Commissiover Hoyt felt this should be sta_adied very careful? •{. Chairmian !"fichelotti favored medausrr dens:.ty on thv Ci-ca_a proper-~-,- because of the airport. ~: moticsrr i~as sriade by Camcrrissioner Eaercer, seconded b;° Cammi ssi over Havi ngh tc certify that the EiR ~-:as beers casrrpl eted i n camel i ance with CECl~ and that the a rrf or,ii"t i on arc tie f a rrai EIR has been considered; that the reguired CEt?fl findings are made as detailed in t:`se attached exhat~it; as-:d appr--ove adoption of the Specific FI an, aai th the revi si ons recom,r:ended. Faa;e 1 -