Laserfiche WebLink
designation of these properties once annexed may hear little <br />resemblance to the prezoning. t`9r. S:4ift said the Alameda County <br />Formatior-+ Commission requires that the City prezone property <br />before it is annexed. The City is simply prezoning it what the <br />General Flan designation is. <br />Commissioner Mahern asked Mr. Swift if the a:-inexation come hack <br />before the Commission or goes directly to City Council. <br />P'3r. Swift Bald it first goes to the Alameda County Formation <br />Coa-nmission. If they approve it, for all purposes it is <br />approved. <br />Ct-:airma;~ !"lichelotti wished to state for the record that what <br />they are looking for- is a feathering effect, in particular on <br />the Dawes parcel. <br />Cotil~3ti ssi oner Hoyt sal d he wsas uncomf ortabl e with a high density <br />designation on the Dawes parcel. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Berger, seconded by <br />Commissioner i-ioyt to recommend approval of the Negative <br />Declaration prepared for Case F?Z-88-1.^•_ as approval of this <br />project would have an insignificant effect on the environment; <br />finding tl-'sat the proposed zoning districts are consistent with <br />the goals and policies of the Ger-~eral Flan, and prezone the <br />Fazzari/Cor-IeylAguirre/t'''toiinaro properties {tC,~ acres) to the FUD <br />- Low Density F~esidential District, prezone the l?awes/Montgomery <br />properties {ig acres? to the FUD - E"fediumfNigh intensity <br />~:esidential district, and prezone the F;amp property tone acre) <br />to the FUD -~ Medium Density ~;esidentiai District. <br />t~OLL_CALL_VOTE_ <br />AYES: Commissioners Berger , Hovi ngh , !-foyt , Maher-ri , and <br />Chairman Michelotti <br />Ni-1ES : None <br />ADSENT: None <br />AEsSTAIt+1e Noree <br />C~esolz:tion No. FC-$8-1?~ wsas entered and adopted approving of <br />the Neoative Declaration for Case RZ-88-12 as motioned. <br />i;:esolutaon No. F'C-88-1._tv~ was entered and adopted recomcr~ending <br />approval of Case RZ-88-12 as motioned. <br />AP-_i~i3_31s_McCarthy_Landscaee_Maintenance <br />Appeal of a decision of the Zoning Administrator denying Case <br />Z-88-531, the application of McCarthy Landscape Maintenance for <br />a home occupation permit to operate a landscape maintenance <br />service to be located at 259 Kottinger Drive. Zoning for the <br />property is R-i-65C~U t5ingle-family Residential) District. <br />Mr. Sw3ift presented the staff report recommending denial of Case <br />AF`-88-~} 1. <br />F'age 4 <br />