Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. FC-88-97 was entered and adopted approving Case <br />UF'-88-L,:z as motioned. <br />RZ-_98-_1s_City_of_Pleasanton <br />Application of the City of Pleasanton to amend the Municipal <br />Code relating to provisions for secondary dwelling units in <br />residential districts. <br />Application continued to September 28, 1988. <br />NEW_BUSINESS_=_Public_Hearings <br />Rev_iew_of_Redev_eloQment_Plan <br />Review and recommendation to Pleasanton Community Development <br />Agency concerning proposed Redevelopment Plan and Draft <br />Environmental Impact Report. The Redevelopment plan involves <br />X53 million of public improvements within a 395 acre area <br />surrounding Downtown Pleasanton. An Environmental Impact Report <br />will also be considered. <br />Chairman Michelotti abstained from the case because of being a <br />downtown property owner- Commissioner 5erger acted at Chairman. <br />I~'I'Ir. Lee presented the staff report recommending that the <br />Commission adapt the attached resolution recommending approval <br />of the revised Redevelopment Flan tdated September 16, 1988) and <br />making findings that the Redevelopment Flan is consistent with <br />the General Flan. <br />-+9r. Lee discussed with the Commission Permitted Uses on Fage ~ <br />of the Flan. Hee5noshouldhabetspentdeVSta~fefeltii~t wouldnbe <br />specafy where mona <br />best to maintain maximum fle~:ibility in the Flan. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Thurman Caudill, a 4b year resident of Pleasanton, was opposed <br />to the Redevelopment Flan. He felt it would be setting up a <br />dictatorship and that people could subsequently be put out of <br />their own homes. He felt that nearby Livermore businessmen were <br />being squeezed out of their establishments because of being part <br />of a Redevelopment Plan. He said that Community Development <br />Agency plans to put in 4G' spaces for parking lots and not tell <br />people about it. He felt that these places should be paid for. <br />He thought that Pleasanton is doing ail right without the plan <br />and was not i n favor of i t . <br />Leo Heckathorn, 4i~2 Stanley Filvd., a resident of 25 years, also <br />opposed the Redevelopment F'Ian and did not think it was wise for <br />Fi easareton tc, !-gave one. He cited a situation i n Livermore where <br />established trees are being cut doain in the downtown area and <br />replaced with potted ones that do not grow well. He requested <br />more information about the what the Redevelopment Plan was all <br />abort . <br />Fage L+ <br />