PC 09/28/88 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairman Michelotti asked Mr. f2uaglia if the Compliance and Monitoring Committee met. Mr. L•?uaglia said they have met and the results were included in the State of the City Report. This included noise monitoring, air quality, and water quality. One meeting has been held since then and another will be held about the first or second week of October. Chairman Michelotti expressed concern about air quality and wondered if this is being checked. Mr. G!uaglia said it is monitored monthly. Chairman Michelotti stated that Case SP-88-1, City of Pleasanton will not be acted upon tonight, but that public testimony will be taken. OLD BUSINESS - Public Hearings ---------------------------- RZ=88=is_City_of_Pleasanton Application of the City of Pleasanton to amend the Municipal Code relating to provisions for secondary dwelling units in residential Districts. Application continued to October 1~. F7ev_i ew_of _Redeyel oement_PI an Review and recommendation to Pleasanton Community Development Agency concerning proposed Redevelopment Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Report. The Redevelopment plan involves X53 million of public improvements within a 385 acre area surrounding Downtown Pleasanton. An Environmental Impact Report will also be considered. Chairman Michelotti abstained from the case because of being a downtown property owner. Commissioner Hoyt acted as Chairman. He stated that no action by the Commission will be taken tonight and will be continued to October 26. Further testimony will be taken tonight. The public hearing was opened. F~ev Davis, 72Bi Val 1 ey lei ew Ct . , President of the Chamber of Commerce, read a letter from the Chamber urging approval of the Redevelopment Plan and the Specific Plan. They expressed concern about the Retail Use Requirements specified on Page 17 under 2D in the Specific Flan. She went on to read that enforcement of this requirement would be unrealistic and cause landlords to encounter hardships in trying to lease space. It was requested that this requirement be struck from the text. She presented the letter to the staff and Commissioners. Thomas Pico, ~'r., 795 Neal Place, was not in favor of adoption of the F:edevelopment Plan. He noted that F•ages 23 and ~4 were missing from his copy of the proposed plan and suggested that other copies be checked. He addressed leis concerns about 1 ow-income housing on Page ,~ ;, i~lo. 4 of the Draf t Environmental Report. He felt that the subject of low-income housing should Page