My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/10/88
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
PC 08/10/88
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:23:26 AM
Creation date
4/13/2007 2:27:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/10/1988
DOCUMENT NAME
PC081088
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The public hearing was closed. <br />Commissioner Berger thanked Mr. Callahan for presenting the model <br />for review. <br />Chairman Michelotti commented that it will be nice to have the <br />Herald back in Pleasanton. <br />Commissioner Tarver stated that the proposal is a very nice <br />building itself but can't support the application because of the <br />same reasons he couldn't support Hacienda structures before, <br />namely; the infrastructure should be in place first. <br />Commissioner Mahren expressed concerns with traffic, however, <br />felt her concerns were alleviated given the shifts of the <br />newspaper operation. <br />Commissioner Hovingh stated that the design is nice but that he <br />would like the traffic in and out to be monitored and preferred <br />that the traffic go north on Hopyard. Chairman Michelotti <br />pointed out that all interior streets in Hacienda Business Park <br />are supposed to be used. They are set up on computers to get a <br />better traffic flow. Chairman Michelotti also stated that light <br />industrial is a lower traffic user than office. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Berger, seconded by Chairman <br />Michelotti that Case PUD-81-30-44D be recommended for approval <br />subject to the conditions of the staff report. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners <br />Michelotti <br />NOES: Commissioner <br />ABSENT: Commissioner <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Berger, Hovingh, Mahern, and Chairman <br />Tarver <br />Hoyt <br />Resolution No. PC-88-93 was entered and adopted recommending <br />approval of Case PUD-81-30-44D as motioned. <br />PUD-87-4-2M JL Construction/Matteson <br />Application of JL Construction Company and Duncan Matteson for a <br />major modification to an approved development plan for a 244-unit <br />residential complex to modify the mix of the unit composition and <br />to modify the private recreation area facilities to be located on <br />an approximately 23 acre site located at 11020 Old Dublin Canyon <br />Road. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) <br />-High Density Residential District. <br />Mr. Quaglia presented the staff report recommending approval of <br />this application. <br />-17- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.