PC 03/23/88 - Laserfiche WebLink

~.on ~i ssi on arEd what i s i n ti ae present p a an : s a r-e# i ec t i on of their desires. ~-:e fe t t!-cat all the issues !-sat: e bee: e addressed Y tint ti~sat the proje>=t was recea :~irEg gr eat ~orE#ict LEA opircions. 3-:e reiterated that the project is not cn ~'leasanton ~-;adc~e. i-!e said that f ~e ~oui d not. accept ;71 ternati .~e ~ or = and r.+oui d 2 i ~-:e tt-Ee CoE;cET,i ssi ;arc ' s reconsi derat i or of the project . Cheri rc?}arc ~i ndse;{ stated that i n his opinion the proposed l a: s does root fit in that particular area and t?-:at they had pre_io~:sly seen ~, di#ferent plan. ofZiiii ssi over i-is=,yt noted that he !-eas i ved i n F'l easaritore #ur 18 ~, ear s and that ~'l easantorc F:i dge i s not just cor,si der-ed to he the ver;: top of the :ridge, hs_.t also the surrounding areas, or in ,T.ioSL residents ` ma nds, anyth: ng tE~eat Wserit !:i gher than a roo-~top cEn Foothill ~iocd. Com,z,issia~ner ~er-ger ask:ed rst'eether streets that have hammer-heads are cor ssi de~-ed to ,he pri trace streets as ~d would tl :ey he maintained b;- the homeos-seers. qtr . ~cF~~:i ssi c§~ agreed that i s correct. Ted Tull •, 3;~ Foot.k-sill F'lace, opposed the entirE= project and felt i t :~onl d deface ~'l easar:ton ~i dqe and the s~irround3 r:g area. He did not chi n~:: treat project i s what was envisioned for that i•~C.riittr. ComErEi ssi over- Tarver comrrientec~ about the C;eroeral ~='l an aET,endmer t and #elt t~sat a mistake had been made in na~:in~ that area CEw dens; tt~. Ne -felt that rnrai dens; ty cE# 1 ur:i t ~e~~ ~ acres coui d he manac;ed i n t!'aat area as staf # i r cd:. c aced ~ s-p ai ter:-aati ve ~. €-ie agreed 'rsit:s ter. Tully in that the proposed project would deface the Fii dge. ~atri d Glenn , 65r? Foothi l ? ~ioad , tr of ced t-Ei s concern about tra#fic on Foothill F.oad if this project is approved, alone sfsi th level oprrcent on Stoneri dge Lori ve. He e.;pressed concern about danger to the wildli#e on the ridge because Eaf dogs that residents :4onld have. !-ie wo"id appreciate seeing somethin;~ that :~e~uld adds ess the i,Tepact the prceject t,*sould have on tr-a##ic. soh I~lalF:_er, 5~~ Glayto~: Street, San Francisco, represented Fast oaf rYa Trails ~:ourEcil. tl!hile actnal3y opposing the project in its enti r ett~ , he e;;pressed ,=ppreci ati on -for trari ous changes i n the proposed plan regardine:a additional open space and a staging area. He stated that as a persoreal opinion he sfsould pre#er to t.ave nothing built on the Fidge and trusted that the Gommi=_•siorc won? d not ma€::e " mi sta~~e similar tcE the Ci tt~' of (-iays.~ard. He e.;pressed appreciation tt-cc:t tl:e v :-sere loo:=i ng at the si t~flat i on v~r tf ti~ar-e-fual y and =elt t;at staf# casTe up kith some interestincl `v'ari dti Cfns i r9 fi ~. ternati `:'ems ~. and ~. t*largaret ~u far represented the F'reser-ve urea F:idgeiarsd~ i c.,marei ttee 4'shi ch has. member-s throng; Eolft the Tri -{.dal l e-; area . She Wage ~