Laserfiche WebLink
Fti[]LL CALL VOTE: <br />~•c'EC: Cccmmi ssi oners Derger , c-!:~-yt , i li ~i-cei ~:tti , i arvc=r any <br />Ctaai rman Li ndse :{ <br />hiuES : <br />~ i~ln e <br />FtESEPaT. !'tiur;e <br />AL~STAIh~: i~lor:e <br />F;esol uti on h•#o. FC-UB-T~ c~as entered and adopted recomsrcerodi ng <br />appr-o•r ai of Case F'Ut?-5~-~-?:.y- i s•` as mat i cned . <br />IYir . 5wi f t said as ~, cT,od i f i cat i on to F'!!:] tia ~ the case goes agai n <br />to City Council. <br />PUD=86_17S_F'resley_Homes <br />Application of Fresley Homes far a development plan approval to <br />construct an appro::imately 239 parcel single-family residential <br />development on the west side of Foothill Road in the area <br />generally west and north of its intersection with 5toneridge <br />Drive and south and west of its intersection with Old Dublin <br />Canyon Road. Zoning for the property is PUD tPlanned Unit <br />Development? - Medium Density Residential. <br />i`'{r. S~~i -t presented t~:e stc<fT report recomc=cendine denial c~T <br />~'a e F'UL-^ob-l ~'. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />1"!i .e ~'.'-c~==:i ssi cti , of F°re~3 e of :~•~ortl~iern ~ai i for~-ti a represented <br />the application. He commented on items in the staff report: <br />Land use EI ement F'ccl i c 1r!; - He ;~ e:. t that t~'se area i rc <br />discLtssi or: was not on F'l easantorc ~i dge, but i n the Food ei l ? s <br />del e=:;r! the F{1 dge. <br />safety Eler~,ent F'r ograrri .~.-_•: - ~-:e felt their- plan fcr :r:inirccal <br />grading appropriately addr-essed the issues of safety. <br />Conner Vati on F'oi i c _ . - i-ie felt the site plan has gone bef and <br />what anyone else has proposcc to preserve the natural state. <br />Conservation Polk:. ~: - Ue sald i89 acres has been dedicated <br />for- open space. <br />F°ro j ect i=ensi t ,r: - Ne felt this project cool €i not be co,~pared tc~ <br />the Col den Eae~l e Farms pr oject and that the gross densi t'y~ of ~~. ~' <br />unitsiacre was apprapr-late for the site. <br />Cradircg: - ~-!e said the proposed gradir:g ~,~o~.:ld not he on <br />F'Ieasarcton Fridge, but c,n a site behind Far,r,ers Insurance. <br />Eeol og-y: - ~e felt that rcat~iral I ~' graded sl apes were not al wa;~°= <br />tie best and t!'cat tie proposed plan property addresses t~;e <br />issue. <br />Traffic and c i rcul ati c,n : - F:e stated e;; i sti ng traffic 3 evei s of <br />ser•>ice ar-e ee: tin City standards. <br />Ne felt the issues of ttae project erct"r-~~ road, ireters`cal road <br />+~~i dtis a roadway i cTiprccvements, staging area, i ceri ta~ge traes and <br />w11s1~$e lad beer properly addressed. He added that c:t? visual <br />areas ~:ou ~ d ultimately be landscaped. ~:s far ate- par~::s are <br />coricerned, this has been discussed rsi th t€-ee F'ar€=:s and F;ecreati on <br />Page <br />