Laserfiche WebLink
t=:eso1 ~~ti on l~~o. F'C-55-~~~ ~sas entered and adopted recornmendi ng <br />::aen i ai of rase 8~'-88-- i as mot i ;;=oned . <br />FUD_86_171_Presley_Homes <br />Application of Presley Homes for development plan approval to <br />construct an approximately 359 parcel single-family residential <br />development to be located on an approximately 27D acre site <br />iocated on the west side of Foothill Road in the area generally <br />west and north of its intersection with 5toneridge Drive and <br />south and west of its intersection with Old Dublin Canyon Road. <br />Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development3 - <br />Medium Density Residential. <br />Application continued to Marti-i 23, 1988. <br />Thf I _Spec i f i c P1 ans_Ci ty_of _P1 i <br />Application of Blackburn <br />Teixeira for Planned Unit <br />development plan approval <br />residential development to <br />acre site located at 2820 <br />property is PUD (Planned <br />District. <br />=asanton <br />Development Company and Matilda <br />Development District rezoning and <br />for a 42 parcel single-f ami 1 y <br />be located on an approximately i5 <br />Vineyard Avenue. Zoning for the <br />Unit Development) - Residential <br />Application continued to March ~+, 1988 <br />f}UD_i38_3s_Hlackburn_Dev_eloQment_Co_/Teixeira <br />Application of Blackburn Development Company and Matilda <br />Teixeira for Planned Unit Development District rezoning and <br />development plan approval for a 42 parcel single-family <br />residential development to be located on an approximately 15 <br />acre site locasted at 282D Vineyard Avenue. Zoning for the <br />property is PUD (Planned Unit Devel opment) - Residential <br />District. <br />Application continued to March '~', iS'88. <br />MATTEFtS_FaR COMMI55IOh1=5_REVIEW <br />Actions of the Council at their meeting of 2!16/88 <br />i'3o action required. <br />Future Planning Calendar. <br />i~3o action required <br />Report on Residential Setbacks <br />Mr . S~rsi f t presented i of ormat i on , noting that the Gommi ssi on <br />coui d review i t and f urther d i rect staf f as to thei r ~rsi sties. i-ie <br />hoped that thi s i of or-rriati on woLtl d give their some i deers i n regard <br />tcs residential setbaciā€¢:s for future projects coming before the <br />Comma ssi on. <br />Commi ssi ones h~i ci-~el otti asp:_ed i # sta# # cool d remind the <br />Commission regarding tt-cis subject as future projects Dome before <br />therrE. <br />Page o <br />