PC 02/24/88 - Laserfiche WebLink

~l ernent of the uer~erdl F'i an to a ncl ude the pol i cv and te;, t ret,~ i si ons ccrntai ned i n the attached tatrl e. Commissioner i'fllichelotti discussed with staff the fact teat the 1-iousi ng Element does not agree with the Esenchmar ~. The public hearing was opened. No one represented the applicataon. The public hearing was closed. r~ ~~ioti on was made by Co1TuTri ssi oner Ala ~hel otti , seconded by Comcril ssi oner i-:o~,~t that tt-de E`~egati ~e Decl ar-ati on prepared f cr Case GF'-85-1 be recommended fr+; appr-oval inasmuci-r as praject app-r oval would hat: e an i nsi gr~~i f i cant adverse effect of t1-'se environment. ROLL CALL VOTE t~YES a Commissioners E~erger , t-Eo ~ t , C'ii chel ott a , and Chairman L:ndse~ hlOEB: Commissioner Tartrer ABSENT: Clone ~STA I hl : Clone ~=;esol zati en C•io. F'C-88-~ i was entered and adopted recommending approval of tt-~e Negative Beclaration as motioned. Commissioner Tar~.jer felt ti eere was more tt~tan an i nsi gni f i oanj~ adverse effect on the en :Fi ronment and coin. d not suuport t6"'ie Negati t: a E7ecl arati on . He felt a better analysis could be dclree regarding t!-Ee si tuata on and thought too much 1 ati tc.Ade a s given to City Council Comma ssi oner Ili chel otti discussed the benchmar ~ and the I-louei rag Element, noi~ang that st-;e fait C1ty Council had changed at. Chats-man Landsey could not see that amendang the Housing Element aaculd change anything. Co~rimassioner Tarver noted that he had supported the concept Same time ago but could not at the present time. r~ motion was made btu Commissioner Herger, seconded try Commi sea oner- Hoyt denying Case O~-BE--i . ROLL CALL VOTE• ,YES: Commissioners Berger , Hoyt , C'li ci-~ei ott i , and Tarver- N~3ES: Chairman Lindsey ~;BSENT: None ~rBSTAIt+J: Cdor:e Page