19 Attachments - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT this issue. Lurie 'finlb~~i responded that the Council appointed the group and the group was doing what the Council wanted. .~ eote ~~°ould be the nest step. Gene Jordan asl.ed w~h~ the audience member felt he's not being represented. The audience member answered that only E3ob ~-9aund was the only one w°ho represented his interest. Gene asked if the audience member thought that the only person wfio looked out for his interest yeas the one from his neighborhood. "hhe audience member confirmed that ~~~~as his feeling. Lurie finfow~ stated the meeting needed to refocus hack to the committee. V~'cs Felton asked for' a clarification on Uptio^ ?and ~. ~1 Spotorno responded that he would not accept Options 3 and 3. and he ~mouldn~t ofler the propert}~. 1he Cite would be looking at condemnation. ~-'es asked if Option 1 meant there would not be a reannmendation on the number of units. Lurie Tintbw confirmed that was the meaning. Greg O'Cunner (audience member) stated he~s a Planning Commissioner. He said he brou~~ht up the b}pass road at the lax? planning commission meeting and understood that this committee is to only discuss the bypass road alignment. not density of housing. He explained that there were risks associated with opening up the Specific Plan. No matter how mane homes were on the hats. the Cite still had to build the bypass road. He stated he did not understand why the committee was talking about density of housing. V~'es Fehon asked "Do we hay e to condemn:'' Grc~u ans~~~cred it depended on the plan. A"ancssa asked if Nelson Pialho. City i~-Tana~acr. said the committee could discuss density`.' Lorin Tinfow~ answered that'~elson said the committee could discuss dcusity and that the Council ~~'as a~~ym~e of this action. nn audience member asked ho~a- the committee could recommend an alignment it they hadn't walked it Lurie ~finlbw shared that Greenbriar brought a yida~ oCthe alignment. .rim Preitas added that still pictures were also taken and rcyiewed. Gene Jordan said he has missed a couple of meetings and asked why status yuo ryas eliminated as an option. Logic l~iufow~ answ°ered that Bob Mawld was the only committee member who ~°oted for status quo at the September "?8 meeting. Pete Richert said part of the reason the committee got rid of it as an option ~~'as that the court order required the Cit~° to construct a bypass road and they felt that recommendin~~ status quo didn't meet the Cit~~~s constraints. Gcnc ,lordan responded that he didn't think the ll~affic was a bi~a problem. Other committee members disagreed. Gene said traffic ou Happy Valle}° from Sunol to the golf course aflected ]ess than 6 ~ homes. Pete reminded the group that Alameda County had stated Happy Valley Road would be closed if plans for a h}-pass road are abandoned. Bob Maund said the intent of the bypass road was to preserve the semi-rural nature of the area. if 6, lulus went in. that Level of deg elopmem would ruin the area. Pat Costanr_o said right now the proposal keeps the area semi-rural. HVBRC Minutes I1-09-06