Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />F'. Matters Before the Committee <br />1.oric Tinfo~~~ prrscnted a ~ucmo that addressed questions related to Bridle <br />G•eel:'S~camure I Ieiahts. and Access to ~11isa1 for Residents ofllomes <br />constructed on Lot 98 (aka Spolorno flat) included as Attachment?. The <br />memo said that there ~~ere t~~~o sets of CC&:Rs that applied to Bridal Creek <br />and both noted the S~~camore Creek Spccilic Plan and~'or the Ilappti~ Valle} <br />Specific Plan. Both plans sho~~ that Sycamore Creek ~'a~~ ~ti~ould be extended <br />e~~cntuall~•. An audience member shared that he ~~~ as not a~~~are that S~•camorc <br />Creek V~'a~~ ~~~ould he the only ~~~a~ to get in and out of the golf course area. <br />I Ie also stated that it «as a~ni'usin~~ because althou~ah there ~~~ere references to <br />the plans made in the CCc~Rs. he did not understand the references or what <br />the Specific Plans a~ntained. ] le said the de~cloper nee er brought the issue <br />for~~~ard and it ~~~as not clear to the a~~era«c person. 1 Ic also noted that the two <br />sets of CC~Its didn~t coyer Sycamore Ilei<ahts. <br />Regarding access to Alisal fir ne~~ dc~~elopmcnt of Lot r)8. Bob Maund stated <br />he thou~~ht thcrr ~~~as nu connection bet~ecn the de~~elopment of Lot 98 and <br />the b}pass road. Lurie ~l~info~o said the Happ~~ ~'alle~ Specific Plan did link <br />the h}pass road ~~-°ith development but ~~as silent about ho«. The document <br />lift the decision for Council to make ~~~hen a dc~~elopment project comes <br />for~~ard. <br />2. Tin(rn~ presented the sununar~ report for Committee revie~~. Vanessa <br />i~aw~aihau asl.ed Mike Tassano to c~plain the standm~ds used to estimate <br />traifiic trips. She said in No~~ember'?OU1. 1?.S was the multiplier of hips per <br />da~~ used prey°irn~sl~ ibr the ~~c~if course. N~~~i the multiplier is 1 ~ U~ips per <br />da~~. ~'h~" Mike Tassano ans«ercd that he took rates ti•om a ?(III stud~~ and <br />rounded to 1O fin- the multiplier. ~"anessa asked ~~~hat the calculations are for <br />trips par dad tul:ing into account the dri~~ing ranee. Mile stated that floc <br />current studies include dri~ingranges ah~ead~. <br />L~»-ie ~I~inlint re~•ic~~ed all of the b~~pass options ~~ith the Committee. She <br />e~plaincd that members of the Committee could ~ ote for as mam options as <br />they ~~~anted to support and the recom~~~endation to Crnmcil ~~~ould report the <br />~~ote for all of the options. Pat Costanzo asked i f the proposal for 7U units <br />could be added to the list of options. Loiic said shed add it if someone <br />~~~anted to mal:r a motion to do so. No motion «~as made. Tour Smith asked <br />~~hcm the desis_*n conditions ~~ould be added. Lurie Tinfo« said it ~~~as her <br />understandin~a that the Committee ~~~anted to include the design conditions <br />~~~ith ~~hate~~cr option ~~~as recommended. AI Spotorno shared that he no <br />longer considered Options ~a and '_'h feasible and an}• pru•suit of them ~~~ould <br />require condemnation. <br />An audience member objected to the conunittce taking am' ~~ote at all. l le <br />stated that the committee etas not rcpresentati~~e of his interests. ITe said Lurie <br />Tinfo« ~~rnild he movin~~ to ~'ahlut Creek and had no long-term interest in <br />H~'I3KC Minutes 11-09-O6 <br />