My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA REPORT
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
042407
>
JOINT WORKSHOP CC/PC - GP
>
AGENDA REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2007 1:20:16 PM
Creation date
4/6/2007 2:59:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/24/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Pleasanton. Staff has reviewed these specific trips that do not begin or end In <br />Pleasanton and summarized the findings below. <br /> <br />Cut -Through Traffic <br />Staff reviewed the volume of cut-through traffic at build-out both with and without the <br />Stoneridge Drive Extension at three key locations: Stoneridge Drive (west of EI Charro <br />Road), Valley Avenue (west of Busch Road) and Stanley Boulevard (east of Santa Rita <br />Road). <br /> <br />Approximately 10 percent of the traffic on the Stoneridge Drive extension will be cut- <br />through traffic. With the Stoneridge Drive extension, the percentage of cut through <br />traffic on Valley Avenue or Stanley Boulevard does not change. The cut-through <br />amount for Valley Avenue will be approximately 7.5 percent of the total volume. The cut <br />through amount for Stanley Boulevard will be approximately 33 percent of the total <br />volume (44 percent in the AM and 22 percent in the PM). There are reductions in total <br />volumes on both Valley Avenue and Stanley Boulevard, and this results in a decrease in <br />the number of cut-through vehicles and Pleasanton based vehicles. However, the <br />proportion of cut-through trips stays relatively unchanged. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />The discussion of data presented above appears to lead to five broad conclusions: <br /> <br />. There is little difference in traffic volume and delay between the three land use <br />plans. This is because although the land use plans show a different geographic <br />distribution for the residential units, some differences in unit type, and some <br />variation in commercial/industrial development in East Pleasanton, the <br />differences in total trips for these plans is insignificant compared to the total trips <br />in the City at build-out. <br /> <br />. On a City-wide level, there is little difference in traffic volumes and delay between <br />the Transit Oriented Development scenario using ITE trip generation rates and <br />the Transit Oriented Development scenario using the reduced traffic generation <br />rates, although differences at a site level may exist. Again, this is because the <br />differences in trips between these two variations is insignificant compared to total <br />trips in the City. <br /> <br />. Construction of the Stoneridge Drive extension results in a redistribution of traffic <br />flows and some relief on heavily traveled routes for all the land use options <br />studied. It results in reduced delay at some critical intersections, and mitigation <br />to acceptable levels of service can be achieved with fewer intersection <br />improvements than without the Stoneridge Drive extension. <br /> <br />. With the Stoneridge Drive extension, traffic increases several-fold on Stoneridge <br />Drive east of EI Charro Road, compared to conditions without the extension. <br /> <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.