My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 07100
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
RES 07100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2007 4:11:15 PM
Creation date
3/30/2007 4:09:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2007
DOCUMENT NO
RES 07100
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pimlico Drive Turnout and Pipeline Project Environmental Checklist <br />12. POPULATION AND HOUSING <br />Environmental Setting <br />The proposed project will be constructed within Pimlico and Brockton drives and within adjacent <br />public rights-of--way and a dedicated public. Adjacent land uses to the project include residential <br />and commercial areas and that are built out. <br />Standards of Significance <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed <br />project would: <br />• Induce substantial growth that is inconsistent with the approved land use plans in place; <br />• Displace affordable housing. <br />Less than <br />Potentially Significant Less than <br />Significant With M1ti[igation Significant No <br />ISSUeS Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />Population and Housin <br />Would the project <br />a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, ~ ~ X <br />either directly (for example, by proposing new <br />homes and businesses) or indirectly (for <br />example, through extension of roads or other <br />infrastructure)'? <br />b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ~ ~ ~ X <br />necessitating the construction of replacement <br />housing elsewhere'? <br />c) Displace substantial numbers of people, ~ ~ ~ ^X <br />necessitating the construction of replacement <br />housing elsewhere'? <br />Discussion <br />a) Less than Significant. A portion of the projected water demands for future growth to <br />build out will be provided by the proposed project through improving the storage <br />capacity of Tassajara Reservoir and improving control capacity of the City's water <br />distribution system. Improving pressure zones in the City-wide water distribution system <br />were analyzed in the 1996 Pleasanton General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report <br />and 1996 General Plan Update. "I'he Water Distribution System Master Plan Update <br />(2002), that was based upon on the 1996 General Plan Update and subsequent City <br />Planning and Community Development departments growth projections, identified <br />improvements to the water distribution system including improving pressures zones <br />required to meet the needs of the system through build out including the proposed <br />project. <br />Crty of Pleasanton 42 Winder & Kelly <br />Draft Initial Study/Proposed Negative Declaration August 2006 <br />04263501 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.