My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 90130
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
RES 90130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2012 1:19:28 PM
Creation date
8/12/1999 7:34:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/10/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
immediately apparenu that the city's ability to meet future demands <br />for service is impacted by the obligation of the general fund to <br />pay the debt service on curren~ and proposed capital projects. The <br />increase in debt service paid by the General Fund is summarized <br />briefly below: <br /> <br />Debt Service General <br /> Fund Obligation <br /> <br />1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 <br />$440,676 $938,906 $978,816 $2,027,495 <br /> <br />The City's growth in revenue specifically from Sales and property <br />taxes should easily support making these debt service payments. <br />This does impact the City's ability, however, to add personnel to <br />mainuain and enhance services to the community during the same <br />period of the debt service. Staff will be reviewing the <br />possibility of paying cash for one or more of the proposed projects <br />to decrease our current obligation on the general fund for these <br />payments. <br /> <br />3. ANNUAL EXCESS REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES <br /> <br />The city has historically at the end of the fiscal year had a <br />surplus of revenues over expenditures. While the staff attempts to <br />continually tighten the budget process and improve our ability to <br />estimate both revenues and expenditures, this is not an unusual <br />occurrence. This revenue has been historically reflected in budget <br />documents as a contingency reserve. This year the document has <br />been revised to reflect that the remaining revenue over <br />expenditures will be a reserve for capital expenditures. This more <br />accurately reflects the current use of this money and is also <br />consistent with the philosophy to utilize only current revenues for <br />current ex~enses. This practice may also help to reduce the debt <br />service payments for the general fund over time. <br /> <br /> C. ENTERPRISE FUNDS <br /> <br />The cost of operating the city's water distribution system and <br />sewage collection system are paid entirely by user fees. <br /> <br /> 1. SEWER FUND <br /> <br />Sewer fees in 1990-91 are estimated to generate approximately <br />$4,033,000 in revenue with proposed expenditures of $3,432,391 and <br />$457,678 for debt service payments for the Cross Town Interceptor <br />Sewer. The fee structure is reviewed and recalculated every two <br />years as a condition of the clean water grants the city has <br />received directly or benefitted from through the Dublin San Ramon <br />Services District and the Livermore Amador Valley water Management <br />Agency. In 1990-91 one-third of an Engineering Technician for <br />computer related services is recommended. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.