My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
032007
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
18 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 1:50:29 PM
Creation date
3/16/2007 2:59:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Landscaping Plan <br />A tree report has been prepared by HortScience in June 2006. The report surveyed 33 trees on <br />the subject site. The majority of the trees were recently planted; 22 of the 33 survey trees are 11 <br />inches or more in diameter. The survey showed that one tree is in a poor condition, with 25 <br />trees in good condition. Due to the scope of the project, 22 of the 33 trees would need to be <br />removed, which includes three heritage-sized trees (two Shamel ash trees and one Yellow <br />willow tree). <br />The proposed landscaping plan includes a variety of trees, shrubs and groundcover. London <br />plane would be planted along the north property side (Golden Road) to replace the existing coast <br />redwoods and hackberry. A heritage-size Yellow willow, an Almond tree and a Blue atlas cedar <br />are located at where it was to be part of the expanded parking lot. The arborist recommended <br />that they be removed. Since the current site plan shows a 25-foot open space buffer would be <br />located along the side adjoining the swim club, staff recommends as a condition of approval that <br />these three trees be retained. <br />For other trees that are in a good condition but are required to be removed to accommodate the <br />proposed development, staff recommends that the applicant pay the differences between the <br />mitigation of planting additional trees and the appraised vales for the loss. The City would use <br />the money to plant trees elsewhere in the City where needed. Thus, in addition to requiring the <br />installation of the landscaping plan as proposed, staff has also added a condition of approval <br />(Condition No. 18) requiring monetary compensation for the loss of the trees prior to the <br />issuance of a building permit. The specific monetary amount would be determined by the <br />Planning Director based on the appraised value. <br />Other Site Improvements <br />Parking lot lights would be included to provide for security and safety. Considering the <br />adjoining residential uses, staff has added a condition of approval (Condition No. 24) requiring <br />light details, include a light fixture details and a lighting cut-sheet, be submitted a part of the <br />construction drawings, and are subject to the approval by the Planning Director. <br />Traffic <br />A traffic study was not required for the proposed project because the uses are not being <br />expanded or the hours of operation. The Traffic Engineer indicated, however, that a traffic <br />study would be required if the preschool program should expand. Staff has added a condition of <br />approval (Condition No. 5) addressing this issue. <br />Case No. PCLiP-L55/PDR-513 Plariizing Commissio~~ <br />Page - 13 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.