Laserfiche WebLink
In addition, the following issues were discussed: <br />1. Parking lot lights; <br />2. The height of the proposed berm along Golden Road; <br />3. The proposed landscaping; <br />4. The possibility of increasing enrollment of the existing preschool program and <br />using the education building as an expanded facility during congregation. <br />Some of the residents objected to any expansion of the existing facility. They expressed the <br />concern that the proposed changes would actually increase membership thereby increasing <br />traffic to the site, resulting in adversely impacting the neighborhood. <br />City hosted neighborhood meeting (December 21, 2006 <br />Staff met independently with the applicant followed by a meeting with neighborhood <br />representatives. At this meeting, staff described the additional reduction of parking from 101 <br />spaces at the Golden Road entry to 77 spaces which also effectively increase the landscape <br />buffer area from the original 20 feet up to an approximately 60 feet. <br />The residents continued to express concern that the Church was not listening to them and that <br />the primary goal of the neighbors present were to: <br />• Prohibit any parking expansion on the Golden Road entry thereby ensuring that <br />the Church could not easily expand membership or Community services; <br />• Prohibit a reduction of any parking spaces on the Del Valle Parkway parking area; <br />• Relocate the siting of the Ministry/Education Building from the proposed location <br />to where the existing modular buildings are located; <br />• Remove the Youth Center/multipurpose room addition thereby likely restricting <br />any additional church related meeting increases. <br />The residents understood that their solution to relocate the proposed Ministry/Education <br />building to the modular building could effectively shut down a portion or all of the Sonshine <br />Preschool operations. The residents believed that this would not be likely in that the Church <br />could relocate the use to the existing building. <br />Staff discussed these options and noted that the loss of the preschool operations would not only <br />be a lost service and amenity to the community, but would likely inconvenience numerous <br />families who use the facility and may not have other facilities easily at hand to take the place of <br />the Sonshine Preschool. Staff also noted that there may not be adequate facilities in the existing <br />building with which to house the preschool. <br />Cuse No. PCUP-155/PDR-513 <br />Planning Commission <br />Puge - 7 - <br />