My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
032007
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
18 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 1:50:29 PM
Creation date
3/16/2007 2:59:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tree Report, Trinity Lutheran Church HortScience, Inc. <br />WMB Architects, June 2006 Page 5 <br />Table 2: Tree Suitability for Preservation, continued <br />Moderate Trees in this category have fair health and/or structural defects that may <br />be abated with treatment. Trees in this category require more intense <br />management and monitoring, and may have shorter life-spans than those <br />in the "good" category. Seven (7) on-site trees were of moderate <br />suitability for preservation. <br />Tree No. Species Diameter <br />259 Deodarcedar 19,18 <br />437 Hackberry 6,5,4,4,4,3,3,3 <br />441 English walnut 6,5,5,4 <br />443 Glossy-leaf privet 7,7,6,3 <br />448 London plane 22 <br />453 Arroyo willow 19 <br />456 Almond 6,5,4 <br />Poor Trees in this category are in poor health or have significant defects in <br />structure that cannot be abated with treatment. These trees can be <br />expected to decline regardless of management. The species or <br />individual tree may possess either characteristics that are undesirable in <br />landscape settings or be unsuited for use areas. Two (2) on-site trees <br />were of poor suitability for preservation. <br />Tree No. Species Diameter <br />(in.) <br />435 Sweet gum 7 <br />454 Almond 9,8,7,7,6,6,5 <br />We consider trees with good suitability for preservation to be the best candidates for <br />preservation. We do not recommend retention of trees with low suitability for preservation in <br />areas where people or property will be present. Retention of trees with moderate suitability for <br />preservation depends upon the intensity of proposed site changes. <br />Evaluation of Impacts and Recommendations for Preservation <br />Appropriate tree retention develops a practical match between the location and intensity of <br />construction activities and the quality and health of trees. The Tree Survey was the reference <br />point for tree condition and quality. Potential impacts from construction were evaluated using <br />the Grading plan (Alexander and Associates, 2/21/06). The plans showed the location of the <br />existing and proposed buildings, existing and proposed parking lots, grading and utility <br />information. Tree trunk locations and approximate driplines were also present on the plan. <br />The proposed project would construct a new ministry center, add a new youth center to the <br />existing church building, install new parking lots and reconfigure existing parking lots, and add <br />bioswales for storm water retention. The most significant impacts to trees would be <br />associated with construction of the new ministry and youth centers. <br />Potential impacts from construction were estimated for each tree. Construction of the ministry <br />and youth center buildings will require the removal of eight (8) trees (Table 3), none of which <br />qualify as 'Heritage trees'. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.