My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
032007
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2007 1:11:40 PM
Creation date
3/15/2007 12:51:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pimlico Drive Trernoat mul Pipeline Project Environmental Checklist <br />j) No Impact. The City of Pleasanton is not at risk from seiche, tsunami, or mudflow <br />Therefore, this would be no impact. <br />9. LAND USE PLANNING <br />Environmental Setting <br />The project is located in an urban area. The project facilities will be placed within City <br />roadways, public rights-of-way and a dedicated public utility easement. <br />Standards of Significance <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed <br />project would: <br />• Substantially conflict with an approved land use plan that would result in physical change <br />to the community or environment. <br /> Less than <br />Potentially Significant Less than <br />Significant Wi[h Mitigation Significant Vo <br />ISSUES Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />Land L1se Plannin <br />Would the project <br />a) Physically divide an established community? ^ ^ ^ ^ <br />b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, ^ ^ ^ ^X <br />policy or regulation of an agency with <br />~urisdlction over the project (including, but not <br />limited to the general plan, specific plan, local <br />coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted <br />for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br />Environmental effect? <br />c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation ^ ^ ^ ^X <br />plan or natural community conservation plan? <br />Discussion <br />a) No Impact. The project facilities, including the buried water transmission pipeline, <br />fluoridation building, Zone 7 turnout, and two below ground vaults, will not physically <br />divide an established community, because the pipeline, turnout, and vaults arc <br />underground facilities, and the fluoridation building is a small structure. Therefore, this <br />would be no impact. <br />b) No Impact. The project facilities are located within roadways and public rights-of-way <br />within areas zoned as PUD-C Planned Unit Development-Commercial, CF- Commercial <br />Freeway, PUll-RM25- Residential Multifamily 2500 square feet and R-1-65- Residential <br />dwelling unit per 6500 square feet (City of Pleasanton 2005). The project facilities are <br />City of Pleasanton 38 Winzlcr ~Cc Kelly <br />Draft Initial Study/Proposed Negative Dcclarahon August 2006 <br />04263501 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.