My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
032007
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2007 1:11:40 PM
Creation date
3/15/2007 12:51:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pimlico Drive Turnout and Pipeline Project Errnironmental Checklist <br />5. CULTURAL RESOURCES <br />Environmental Setting <br />The project area was not identified as having site specific historic period archeological or Native <br />American resources. A cultural resources records search showed no recorded occurrences of <br />historic period archeological resources occurring within the project area, and no Native <br />American resources in or adjacent to the proposed project area are referenced in the ethnographic <br />literature. State and federal inventories list no historic properties within the proposed project area <br />(Sonoma State University Northwest Information Center 2006). <br />Based upon an evaluation of the environmental setting and features associated with known sites <br />conducted by the Sonoma State University Northwest Information Center (2006), Native <br />American cultural resources in this part of Alameda County have been found in valleys in close <br />proximity to seasonal and perennial watercourses. The proposed project area is located in the <br />Amador Valley at the valley floor level with numerous creeks in close proximity. C;iven the <br />similarity of these environmental factors, there is a moderate likelihood that unrecorded Native <br />American cultural resources exist in the proposed project area. <br />Review of historical literature and maps also showed that three historic-period buildings <br />occurred near the proposed project area. Therefore, there is a moderate possibility of identifying <br />historic-period archaeological resources during construction. <br />Standards of Significance <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed <br />project would: <br />• Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical or archeological resource as <br />defined in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; or, <br />• Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic <br />feature. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />S$Qe5 <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact Less than <br />Significant <br />With Miliga[ion <br />Incorporated <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />10 <br />Impact <br />Cultural Resources <br />Would the project: <br />a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ^ ^ ^ ^ <br />significance of a historical resource as defined in <br />§ 15064.5? <br />b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ^ ^ ^ ^ <br />significance of an archaeological resource pursuant <br />to § 15064.5'? <br />City of Pleasanton 25 Win zler Sc Kelly <br />Draft Initial Study/Proposed Negative Declaration August 2006 <br /> 04263501 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.