My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
032007
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
19 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:06:45 PM
Creation date
3/15/2007 12:31:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
19 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tree Report, Peet's Coffee HortScience, Inc. <br />Peter G. Shutts Page 4 <br />Suitability for Preservation <br />Before evaluating the impacts that will occur during development, it is important to <br />consider the quality of the tree resource itself, and the potential for individual trees to <br />function well over an extended length of time. Trees that are preserved on development <br />sites must be carefully selected to ensure that they survive development impacts, adapt to <br />a new environment, and perform well in the landscape. <br />Our goal is to identify trees that have the potential for long -term health, structural stability <br />and longevity. For trees growing in the open areas, structural defects and /or poor health <br />presents a low risk of damage or injury if they fail. However, we must be concerned about <br />safety when sites will be developed. Therefore, where development encroaches into <br />existing plantings, we must consider the potential for trees to grow and thrive in a new <br />environment as well as their structural stability. Where development will not occur, the <br />normal life cycles of decline, structural failure and death should be allowed to continue. <br />Evaluation of suitability for preservation considers several factors: <br />• Tree health <br />Healthy, vigorous trees are better able to tolerate impacts such as root injury, <br />demolition of existing structures, changes in soil grade and moisture, and soil <br />compaction than are non - vigorous trees. <br />• Structural integrity <br />Trees with significant amounts of wood decay and other structural defects that <br />cannot be corrected are likely to fail. Such trees should not be preserved in areas <br />where damage to people or property is likely. <br />• Species response <br />There is a wide variation in the response of individual species to construction <br />impacts and changes in the environment. In our experience, for example, red <br />ironbark is difficult to preserve. They rarely recover from injuries to the root <br />system. In contrast, sweetgum is more tolerant of site disturbance. <br />• Tree age and longevity <br />Old trees, while having significant emotional and aesthetic appeal, have limited <br />physiological capacity to adjust to an altered environment. Young trees are better <br />able to generate new tissue and respond to change. <br />Each tree was rated for suitability for preservation based upon its age, health, structural <br />condition and ability to safely coexist within a development environment (see Tree Survey <br />Form and Table 2) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.