Laserfiche WebLink
VIII. CONCLUSION <br />Staff believes the project will be a positive change to this underutilized site. The project's <br />building and site design, as proposed and conditioned, is appropriate for the surrounding area, <br />conforms to the purposes of the PUD Ordinance, and merits a favorable recommendation by the <br />Commission. <br />IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Commission take the following actions: <br />1. Find that the proposed PUD major modification and development plan are consistent with <br />the General Plan and purposes of the PUD ordinance; <br />2. Make the PUD findings for the proposed development plan as listed in this staff report; and <br />3. Adopt a resolution recommending approval of Case PUD- 85- 10 -7M, subject to the <br />conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B, and forward the PUD major modification and <br />development plan to the City Council for public hearing and review. <br />For questions or comments about this proposal, please contact: Steve Otto, Associate Planner at 925- <br />931 -5608 or sotto(t &L pleasanton. ca. us. <br />Page - 12 <br />