My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
030607
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2011 2:53:35 PM
Creation date
3/1/2007 3:12:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/6/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eron Brin hurst 1456 Oak Vista <br />ATTACHMENT 7 <br />— discussed his family's has for subdividing the <br />perty and <br />the affects of being required t. ave a trail located through t middle of the property, ich would <br />affect lot sizes and traffic <br />Mr. Dunn discussed e subcommittee's views, arld'why it felt that the exist. _ trail location was the <br />best site. He felt at additional information ws'needed from staff in or for the Committee to e <br />an appropriat -commendation. Mr. Wol fesuggested a member of titt Planning Department, aff be <br />invited to next Committee meeting to`address the group's conchs. <br />,v- <br />Cha .erson Kummer requested that staff arrange to have tJproject's assigned Citylanner attend the <br />J y Committee meeting to reyiew the following items ,vf concern for the Bringhurst property: 1) trail <br />location; 2) property setback` issues; 3) history of the;ciroperty and whether it is' a part of the Happy <br />Valley Specific Plan; apd4) provide a GIS map of the property. ; ,' <br />Mr. Dunn asked Aout the possibility of lo eating the trail within the'5-foot setback that M ringhurst <br />had indicates], as a requirement. Mrs Volfe advised that this wis a question that Plann' staff would <br />be able to,,iswer. ,,'t <br />Li nd Eron Bringhurst w Gated that they had ho d that the Committee c9rffd make a decision on <br />t ei�i it request at this meet g, but agreed that Pla mg Department staff sh d address the Committee's <br />questions and conce <br />Mr. Shaper i Gated that he would to give up the option o e trail alignment and character, and <br />wondered : lout the possibility or aintaining the easemen ut not developing the trail, until something <br />could be done in the future to c nnect to the open space. <br />B. Iron Horse Trail North (Santa Rita Road to BART Station — Discussion of Potential <br />and Preferred Alignments <br />Ms. Ventura advised that installation of the Iron Horse Trail between Santa Rita Road and Mohr Avenue <br />is in progress, with the section from Busch Road expected to commence in July. The question now is <br />"given all the potential constraints, what is the best and /or most expedient alignment to get trail users <br />from the BART station to the segment at Santa Rita Road ?" <br />The staff report provided three (3) options for the Committee to consider. Ms. Ventura reviewed these <br />options with the Committee, and reminded everyone that although this trail would be traveling through <br />Pleasanton, it would still be an East Bay Regional Park District trail. <br />Mr. Townsend indicated that he did not believe Option 3 reflected all of his comments made at a <br />previous meeting. It is East Bay Regional Park District's (EBRPD) desire to align the trail along the <br />Alameda County transportation corridor "to as great an extent as possible" because the District has the <br />license to use the corridor. He felt that continuing the trail along a sidewalk was not a good <br />recommendation. Mr. Wolfe discussed with Mr. Townsend some areas of the Iron Horse Trail in <br />Walnut Creek that he believed did continue on sidewalks. Mr. Townsend did not believe this was <br />correct, but agreed to check. <br />Trails Ad Hoc Committee <br />June 26, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.