12 Exhibits - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Pavan replied that staff could look at the delivery schedules to minimize or possibly eliminate any impact to thc synagogue and would address this issue in the statf report for the public hearing. Commissioner Blank stated that he had received a lot of comments fi'OlTI the general public regarding having two Home Depot stores in Pleasanton and inquired if staff has addressed the economic viability of this situation. Mr. Pavan deferred the question to the applicant. Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the City would have any latitude in directing the route of the delivery trucks, for instance, through 1-580 or Stanley Boulevard or through 1-680 and First Street. Mr. Pavan replied yes. He added that the City does not have any designated truck routes, per se, and that this would be addressed in the statf report for the public hearing. In response to Commissioner Olson's inquiry regarding when the traffic study would be completed, Mr. Pavan replied that he did not have an estimate of when it would be completed. Chairperson Arkin indicated that at the last workshop, the Commission requested that the traffic model run two scenarios: onc with two Homc Depot stores, and a second without the Johnson Drive store. He inquired whether this was being done, expressing coneern that should the existing store close down, people ti'om the west side of town would drive east to the Home Depot store at this site, thereby adding more traffie to Valley A venue. Mr. Pavan replied that he was not sure if this was being done but that he would eheck on it. He then referred the Commission to Attachment 5 of the staff report, a letter ti-om Greg S. George of Home Depot stating that the new store could co-exist with the Johnson Drive store. Commissioner O'Connor inquired ifit would be realistie to run a traffic model ofthe scenario which assumes the closing down of the existing Home Depot, considering that the building would not remain empty and without knowing what would replace it. Mr. Pavan replied that a trat1ic analysis could be run with this scenario; however, for it to be realistic, a determination would need to be made regarding what would replace it. I-Ie noted that home improvement stores have a rclatively lower trip generation rate for AM/PM peak hours in comparison to a standard retail commercial facility. IIe added that he believed the PUD for Pleasanton Square on Johnson Drive specitically identifies the use of the site as a Home Depot store and would require a modification if another type of store replaced it. Chairperson Arkin commented that the architecture was completely different than the other buildings in the area and inquired if staff took note of that. Mr. Pavan replied that staff recognized that IIome Depot stores have a certain look to them and tried to accommodate that. He added that the I-Iome Depot design matches the overall pallet of materials, colors, and detail of the other satellite stores, with the covered arcade utilizing the same composition shingle material and wainscot used by the other stores. Commissioner Blank concurred with Chairperson Arkin's assessment. Commissioner O'Connor noted that the north end of the building eontained more architectural detail than the south end where the garden center was located, which looks very plain for a long distance. He suggested that the garden center include a more substantial entry similar to that at the contractor EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, May 24, 2006 Page 2 of II