Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Pleasanton Gateway Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant I.css Than <br /> Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br />IsslIes (continued) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />V) Other public facilities? D D D [K] <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />a-e) The project developer will contribute to the construction of schools/school facilities through the <br />payment of school impact fees. Police, Fire, Park and related service capacities exist to ade- <br />quately serve the project and will be mitigated through the design phase of the project to meet <br />the current City development standards. Therefore, this would be a no-impact. <br /> <br />14. RECREATION <br /> <br />Environmental Setting <br /> <br />The project site is will not be providing on-site parkland. <br /> <br />Standards of Significance <br /> <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project <br />would: <br />· Result in the failure to meet City standards for the provision of parkland. <br /> <br />Issues <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Signit1cant <br />Impact <br /> <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />With Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br /> <br />I,css Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />No <br />Impact <br /> <br />Recreation <br />Would lhe project: <br /> <br />a) Would the project increase the use of existing neigh- <br />borhood and regional parks or other recreational facili- <br />ties such that substantial physical deterioration of the <br />facility would occur or be accelerated? <br /> <br />b) Does the project include recreational facilities or re- <br />quire the construction or expansion of recreational fa- <br />cilities, which might have an adverse physical effect <br />on the environment? <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />[K] <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />[R] <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />a-b) The proposed development will not accelerate the substantial deterioration of existing facilities <br />near the subject site. Therefore, this would be a no-impact. <br /> <br />Pleasanton Gateway Initial Study <br /> <br />Page 32 of 37 <br /> <br />November 8, 2006 <br />