My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 Exhibits
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
022007
>
12 Exhibits
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2007 3:42:28 PM
Creation date
2/15/2007 3:32:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/20/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 Exhibits
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Pleasanton Gateway Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant I.css Than <br /> Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br />IsslIes (continued) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />V) Other public facilities? D D D [K] <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />a-e) The project developer will contribute to the construction of schools/school facilities through the <br />payment of school impact fees. Police, Fire, Park and related service capacities exist to ade- <br />quately serve the project and will be mitigated through the design phase of the project to meet <br />the current City development standards. Therefore, this would be a no-impact. <br /> <br />14. RECREATION <br /> <br />Environmental Setting <br /> <br />The project site is will not be providing on-site parkland. <br /> <br />Standards of Significance <br /> <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project <br />would: <br />· Result in the failure to meet City standards for the provision of parkland. <br /> <br />Issues <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Signit1cant <br />Impact <br /> <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />With Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br /> <br />I,css Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />No <br />Impact <br /> <br />Recreation <br />Would lhe project: <br /> <br />a) Would the project increase the use of existing neigh- <br />borhood and regional parks or other recreational facili- <br />ties such that substantial physical deterioration of the <br />facility would occur or be accelerated? <br /> <br />b) Does the project include recreational facilities or re- <br />quire the construction or expansion of recreational fa- <br />cilities, which might have an adverse physical effect <br />on the environment? <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />[K] <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />[R] <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />a-b) The proposed development will not accelerate the substantial deterioration of existing facilities <br />near the subject site. Therefore, this would be a no-impact. <br /> <br />Pleasanton Gateway Initial Study <br /> <br />Page 32 of 37 <br /> <br />November 8, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.