Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />The City has accepted the payrnent of fees in lieu of intersection improvements for previ- <br />ous projects - The U.S. Petroleurn service station on the southwest corner of Bernal A ve- <br />nue and Utah Street and the Bernal Avenue retail center located on the west side of <br />Bernal A venue opposite the Home Depot site. <br /> <br />Therefore, the applicant's payment oftrat1ic fees along with the construction of the Stanley/Val- <br />ley/Bernal intersection improvements implements Program 2.5 of the Circulation Element of the <br />Pleasanton General Plan, which states, <br /> <br />"Require whatever mitigation measures are necessary, including the withholding <br />of building permits, to return intersections to acceptable levels, in the event that <br />LOS "0" is exceeded." <br /> <br />California Splash Trat1ic <br /> <br />The Dowling traffic report did not include the approved trips for the California Splash develop- <br />ment given that its trips were determined to be primarily off-peak trips, thereby not impacting <br />the weekday a.m./p.m. peak commute hours: 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., <br />respectively. <br /> <br />Loop Road Alternative <br /> <br />The traffic analysis also reviewed in detail the effect of a loop road located as a connection trom <br />the parking area at the east boundary adjacent to the P. G. & E. substation site. This review <br />evaluated the surrounding circulation and levels-of.-service. The loop road alternative was <br />evaluated to see if it would mitigate the LOS conditions at the Stanley/Valley/Bernal intersec- <br />tion without the need to widen any leg of this intersection. However, the report shows that the <br />improvements to LOS brought about by the loop road alone would be negligible and would still <br />require roadway widening/modification of the intersection. The loop road also raised various <br />concerns pertaining to the project's building and site design treatments. The alternative would <br />have also required acquisition of additional right-of-way ti'om P. G. & E. Staff does not rec- <br />ommend the loop road alternative in that it would require direct access from Nevada Court along <br />with changing the cul-de-sac to a through lane. These changes would impact the Congregation <br />Beth Emek, facing Nevada Court. The Congregation Beth Emek have stated their opposition to <br />the loop road as noted above. <br /> <br />Valley Avenue Traffic Levels <br /> <br />Valley A venue neighbors expressed their concerns regarding the proposed project and its impact <br />to the Valley Avenue traffic levels. The following table contains a summary of those impacts to <br />tive Valley A venue intersections for the a.m./p.m. peak hour volumes, based on the information <br />provided in trat1ic study in the following figures: <br /> <br />PCUP- 1 65/P DR-529/P MOD-H1 -25-7 M <br /> <br />Page 21 of48 <br /> <br />December 13, 2006 <br />