My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
022007
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2007 4:10:22 PM
Creation date
2/14/2007 2:52:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/20/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit A <br />Page 1 <br />SCOPE OF SERVICES <br />Option One: Separate Community Satisfaction and Ballot Measure Feasibility Survevs <br />If conducted separately, a community satisfaction survey would be conducted using <br />random-digit-dial methodology to reach a random sample of adult Pleasanton residents. <br />The survey would assess Pleasanton residents' perceptions and attitudes toward City <br />facilities and services, their perceptions of need for improvements or additions to City <br />facilities and services and their priorities for the City's future. For this survey, FMM&A <br />would recommend a sample size of 400 residents and a survey averaging 15 minutes in <br />length. <br />In this approach, the results of the community satisfaction survey would be used to <br />inform the design of a ballot measure feasibility survey. In this survey, FMM&A would <br />interview a random sample of registered voters in the City of Pleasanton who are <br />considered likely to cast ballots in the November 2008 election. Within that sample, it <br />will be possible to examine the opinions of subgroups who are likely to vote in June <br />2008 or November 2007 elections. The feasibility survey would be designed to assess <br />voters' positions on key elements of possible finance measures, including the relative <br />importance of specific elements of the projects to be funded, support for various specific <br />funding mechanisms, and willingness to pay for improvements at various cost levels. <br />For this survey, FMM&A would recommend a sample size of 500 residents and a survey <br />averaging 20 minutes in length. <br />Option Two: Combined Community Satisfaction and Ballot Measure Feasibility Survev <br />FMM&A can also conduct one survey combining elements of a community satisfaction <br />survey and a ballot measure feasibility survey. In this survey, FMM&A would interview a <br />random sample of registered voters in the City of Pleasanton who are considered likely <br />to cast ballots in the November 2008 election. Within that sample, it will be possible to <br />examine the opinions of subgroups who are likely to vote in June 2008 or November <br />2007 elections. The survey would briefly explore community satisfaction with City <br />facilities and services and perceived need for improvements or additions to City facilities <br />and services, and would also assess voters' positions on key elements of possible <br />finance measures. For this survey, FMM&A would recommend a sample size of 600 <br />voterss and a survey averaging 25 minutes in length. <br />Survey Research Process <br />In either case, the questionnaire development process will begin with a brainstorming <br />meeting with City staff. The meeting will provide a comprehensive discussion about <br />major issues regarding the City, its funding needs, and any other issues that should be <br />explored in the survey. In this meeting, City staff and FMM&A will decide whether to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.