My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 07087
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
RES 07087
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2007 12:21:36 PM
Creation date
2/12/2007 12:20:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DOCUMENT NO
RES 07087
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and to help screen any future roof-top equipment. The top of the proposed gymnasium roof <br />measures approximately 31 feet in height. The applicants have extended the side walls of the <br />gymnasium three feet above the top of the gymnasium roof in order to improve the aesthetics of <br />the building and avoid the unattractive, "box-like" design commonly found on gymnasium <br />buildings. The extension of the side walls would also help to screen any future roof-top <br />equipment, such as photovoltaic panels. These are special circumstances applicable to the <br />property, and, therefore, the first finding can be made. <br />2. The granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege <br />inconsistent with the limitation on other properties classified in the same zoning district. <br />In order for this finding to be made, there must exist a relationship between the special <br />circumstances applicable to the property and the variance in question. As stated above, there <br />are special circumstances applicable with respect to the gymnasium use of the building and the <br />desire to make the gymnasium design attractive and to provide screening of roof-top equipment. <br />Only the gymnasium portion of the building would exceed the 30-foot height limit. For height <br />comparison purposes, the newer public school gymnasiums at Harvest Park Middle School, <br />Pleasanton Middle School, and Thomas Hart Middle School measure approximately 38 feet, 37 <br />feet 8 inches, and 38 feet, respectively. The Pleasanton Middle School and Harvest Park <br />School gymnasiums exceed the height limits of their respective zoning districts. However, <br />variances were not required for the school gymnasiums because public school buildings are not <br />subject to City review or zoning regulations such as height limits. Therefore, approving the <br />height variance for the gymnasium portion of the building would not be precedent-setting, and <br />this second finding can be made. <br />3. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety ~' <br />or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. <br />The proposed 77-foot rear yard setback to the closest residential properties on Bowen Street <br />would provide an adequate buffer to minimize building massing impacts on the Bowen Street <br />neighbors and would provide adequate light and open space between the church and residential <br />properties. The taller gymnasium walls are located an additional 28 feet from the southernmost <br />end of the building wall, resulting in a 105-foot rear yard setback from the Bowen Street <br />neighbors' rear property line to the taller gymnasium walls. The building mass has been <br />minimized as a result of the side gymnasium walls angling in towards the top and because the <br />taller side walls don't wrap around to the front and rear of the gymnasium. The gymnasium <br />walls would also slightly undulate in and out and up and down to add interest and reduce the <br />mass of the building compared to a flat building wall. Additionally, the 34-tall gymnasium walls <br />would be located along a 110-foot long portion of the approximately 302-foot long building. The <br />remainder of the building would be well below the 30-foot height limit with only the very top ridge <br />of the roof over the conference room reaching a maximum height of 29 feet 3 inches. It would <br />also be difficult to perceive the height difference between a 30-foot tall building and a 34-foot tall <br />building. Therefore, the granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public health, <br />safety, or general welfare or materially injurious to properties in the area, and this third finding <br />can be made. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.