Laserfiche WebLink
$10,000 limit or 0.5 percent of the total bid amount requirement ($1,785,700 x <br />0.5=$8,928.50) threshold for listing subcontractors and thus was not included in <br />JMB's subcontractor listing. <br />The City is also in receipt of a letter from the President of Emerald Plumbing and Fire <br />Protection confirming that they have a C16 license and that the contract amount being <br />paid to them by JMB is under the $10,000 or .5% threshold amount that would require <br />them to be listed on the bid form. City staff and the City Attorney's office have reviewed <br />the documentation submitted and concur that JMB has met the bidding requirements. <br />We therefore recommend award of the Booster Pump Station contract to the lowest <br />responsible bidder, JMB Construction, Inc. <br />DIRECT PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT <br />The following provides an explanation as to why staff has recommended that the City <br />procure and supply electrical and control equipment for the Vineyard Corridor Water <br />Booster Pump Station, which will be installed by the pump station contractor. <br />On December 19, 2006, Council rejected bids for the City's Sewer Pump Station S-5 <br />construction project. The project was formally bid, but only three bids were received. <br />The three .bids ranged from $1,763,000 to $2,096,000, compared to the consulting <br />engineer's estimate of $1,000,000. Following a detailed review of these bids and a <br />subsequent meeting with the apparent low bidder, staff became aware that there was a <br />premium being paid on the supply and installation for electrical switchgear and controls <br />in the current construction market. This was partially due to the demand for these <br />products in comparison to the current supply. This became apparent in the S-5 pump <br />station bid whereby the electrical and control portion of the work (materials and <br />installation) was estimated at approximately $300,000 and the actual bids for this <br />portion of the work was closer to $700,000. <br />As a result of this bid for the S-5 Pump Station and the information regarding the <br />electrical and control instrumentation bidding market climate, staff began working with <br />the City's prime design consultant and electrical sub-consultant for the VCSP Water <br />Booster Pump Station to determine ways to limit paying this premium on this new pump <br />station. The conclusion to this effort was the recommendation by the electrical sub- <br />consultant, that the City directly purchase and supply the electrical, control and water <br />testing components for this new pump station from known manufacturers of this <br />equipment and then provide this equipment to the successful low bidder on the pump <br />station project for installation. While this recommendation does add some minor <br />complexity and risk back to the City, from all indications and estimates City staff <br />received prior and at the pump station bid, packaging the bid proposal for the pump <br />station with the City supplying the aforementioned equipment appears to have saved <br />the City a minimum of $100,000. These savings are due in part to minimizing the dual <br />markup on this equipment by the pump station's electrical subcontractor and the prime <br />contractor for this portion of the work. Hence, staff is recommending that Council <br />authorize the direct purchase of this equipment based upon the City's purchasing <br />guidelines from reputable manufacturers, for a total amount not-to-exceed $220,000. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />