20A - Laserfiche WebLink

(ii) Costal Property: assigned a cost share assuming asix-lot subdivision contributing to all Specific Plan shazed infrastructure improvements. The final share will be based on the number of lots actually approved. Payment of the total lot share will be due at the time a final map is filed for approval (iii) City Fire Station No. Five: assigned a total cost share equal to two EDU's of the sewer improvements. This share will be due at the time of construction of the Part 4 shared sewer improvements. (iv) Any other out-of--area project determined to benefit from Specific Plan Area shared infrastructure improvements shall have the determination of this benefit made at the time of project approe•al. following the assumptions/coefficients used in the Specific Plan for such determination. Example 3A. Developer A of Lot 28 proposes to develop !3 neu~ lots. 3 fet+•er than allocated in the Speciftc Plan. Developer A will nonetheless pay the shared cost for the18 lots permitted in the Speciftc Plan. Financing Program #3. In the event a modification to the Specific Plan is made (or a new out-of--area contributor's share is determined) which affects the total number of F.DUs for any of the shared infrastructure improvements, Table 2 shall be modified to include the new total EDUs which shall be used to calculate all subsequent Lot cost shares. Example SA. Assume the Foley Property seeks development approral and i.~ approved for 10 units. Further assume these units connect to Specific Plun sewers and realigned Vineyard Avenue, but use Rtthv Hill-installed wider mains. The Foley Property project would pay a share oj.sewer• main costs eyuol to 10 EDUs, would have its road costs (EDUs) determined either as a Speciftc Plan project or similar to Ruby Hilf, and +vou/d nut pay,jor Plan Area water cxrstc. Other infrastructure improvements would be determined similarly. Financing Program 116. Modifications to the cost shares shall operate prospectively only. Once payment of the fee or construction of improvements in lieu of fee payment has been completed, the fee as to that Lot shall not be recalculated, whether the total cost share increases or decreases. Examole 6A. Lot 4 develops 7 lots in June. 1000. paying its total. fee. In Oclobcr, a modifrcation to the Specific Plan allows a restaurant/shopping complex on Lnt 28. Adjustments to account for the intensifred use reduce the per unit cult by 32, 000/unit. Neither the Lot 3 developer nor succeeding property owners gjLot 4 parcels is entitled to a rebate of 510, 000. The per unit cost recalculation is made fur, future uses only, and only future uses would bone/it.