12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Exhibit A -Scope of Work ^ Review of the proposed implementation strategies Deliverables as a Result of Task 2.2 -Implementation Strategies. From the work accomplished above, the deliverables for this task will be as follows: ^ Development of an implementation strategy for the smooth transition to the proposed rates Task 2.3-Working Session With the City Council Task Objective: Provide effective public presentations of the findings, results and recommendations of the study. The overall quality and value of a rate study is often measured by the quality of the public presentation process. In addition, the ability of the consultant to present this technical material in a manner that is easily understandable to a City Council and the public is paramount. HDR excels in this aspect of the study. The City has requested one public meeting or working session with the City Council to discuss the findings, conclusions and recommendations of this study. For this meeting, HDR will develop all handout materials. HDR will work with the City to determine the content, timing and schedule for the meeting. Should additional public meetings/presentations be required, they will be provided on a time and material basis. Expected City Staff Support for Task 2.3: For this task, the City will be expected to: ^ Review and comment on any proposed handouts for the working session (public meeting) Deliverables as a Result of Task 2.3 -Working Session With City Council. From the work accomplished above, the deliverables for this task will be as follows: ^ Provide a working session with the City Council to discuss the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the study. Task 2.4-Provide Rate Model Task Objective: Develop a rate model specifically for the City and provide a copy of all rate models developed as a part of this study. The financial/rate model developed for the City will be provided to the City at the end of the study. The model will be developed using the spreadsheet program of the City's choice (e.g. Excel, etc.). The model developed as a part of this study is developed specifically for the City (i.e. built from the ground up). As the model is developed, HDR will work closely with City staff to attempt to provide a model that is easy to use and understand. Within the City's RFP, the City has specified that the model, at a minimum, contain or have the capability to: - Cover a 10-year planning period - Reflect the City budget format and accounts - Use summary tables that will match those shown in the final study report - Provide side-by-side comparisons of rate adjustment tables and graphs of reserve fund balances ^` Comprehensive Loeal Sewer Rate Study A-12 ~. \ City of Pleasanton