25A - Laserfiche WebLink

(ii) Costas Property: assigned a cost share assuming a six-lot subdivision contributing to all Specific Plan shared infrastructure improvements. The final share will be based on the number of lots actually approved. Payment of the total lot share will be due at the time a final map is filed for approval. (iii) City Fire Station No. Five: assigned a total cost share equal to two EDU's of the sewer improvements. This share will be due at the time of construction of the Part 4 shared sewer improvements. (iv) Any other out-of-area project determined to benefit from Specific Plan Area shared infrastructure improvements shall have the determination of this benefit made at the time of project approval. following the assumptions/coefficients used in the Specific Plan for such determination. ExamDle 4A. Developer A of Lot 28 proposes to develop 15 new lots. 3/ewer than allocated in the Specific Plan. Developer A will nonetheless pay the shared cost for the18 lots permitted in the Specific Plan. Financing Program #5. In the event a modification to the Specific Plan is made (or a new out-of-area contributor's share is determined) which affects the total number of EDUs for any of the shared infrastructure improvements. Table 2 shall be modified to include the new total EDUs which shalt be used to calculate all subsequent Lot cost shares. Exam"le 5A Assume the Foley Property seeks developmenT approval and is approvedfor 10 units. Further assume these units connect TO Specific Plan sewers and realigned Vineyard Avenue. but use Ruby Hill-installed water mains. The Foley Property project would pay a share o.fsewer main costs equal 10 10 EDUs. would have its road casts (EDUs) determined either as a Specific Plan project or similar to Ruby Hill. and would not pay/or Plan Area water costs. Other infrastructure improvements would be determined similarly. Financing Program #6. Modifications to the cost shares shall operate prospectively only. Once payment of the fee or construction of improvements in lieu of fee payment has been completed, the fce as to that Lot shall not be recalculated. whether the total cost share increases or decreases. Examole 6A. Lot 4 develops 7 lots in June. 2000. paying ils lotalfee. 1n October, a modification to the Specific Plan allows a restaurant/shopping complex on Lot 28. A4justments to account for the intensified use reduce the per unit cost by $2,OOO/unit. Neither the Lot 4 developer nor succeeding property owners (!{ Lot 4 parcels is entitled to a rebate of$10, 000. The per lInit cost recalculation is made forluture uses only, and only fulure uses would benefit. 5