Laserfiche WebLink
<br />San Francisco Bay Area <br /> <br />Draft Regional Housing Needs Allocation, 4th Revision <br /> <br />regional policies in Projecrions assume that relatively more job growth will occur in existing <br />urbanized communities and near transit, while less growth is projected in outlying <br />communities with no transit infrastructure, including those with agricultural areas and open <br />space. In addition, regional assumptions would promote greater use of public transportation <br />through increased job development near transit. <br /> <br />C. Household Growth near Transit, 10 Percent; Employment Growth near Transit, <br />10 Percent <br /> <br />Each local jurisdiction with an existing or planned transit station should plan for more <br />housing near such stations. As a factor, "household growth near transit" allocates 10 percent <br />of the regional housing need to jurisdictions based on their forecasted household growth near <br />existing or planned transit stations. As a factor, "employment growth near transit" allocates <br />10 percent of the regional housing need to jurisdictions based on their forecasted employment <br />growth near existing or planned transit stations. <br /> <br />Transit is defined as areas with fixed-alignment public transit, both existing and planned. The <br />transit services included are: Altamont Commuter Express (ACE), Bay Area Rapid Transit <br />(BART), Caltrain, San Francisco MUNI light rail, and Santa Clara Valley Transportation <br />Authority (VTA) light rail, and ferries. Planned transit stations include all fixed transit <br />stations in the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's Regional Transportation Plan, <br />Track One. <br /> <br />Growth near transit is defined as household or employment growth within one-half mile of an <br />existing or planned transit station, but eliminating any overlap between stations located <br />within one mile of each other. <br /> <br />Incorporating a transit factor directly into the methodology would, in effect, give extra weight <br />to this state and regional objective. This is because a transit-based policy is already <br />incorporated into ABAG's policy-based Projections. Current regional policy places <br />incrementally more growth along major transportation corridors and at transit stations. <br />Therefore, a housing need allocation that uses regional housing growth and employment as <br />factors would indirectly include "transit" as a policy issue in the allocation methodology. <br />Using transit as a direct factor in the methodology would give transit a greater degree of <br />policy weight. Those jurisdictions with transit stations, existing and planned, would receive a <br />relatively higher proportion of the housing needs allocation than those jurisdictions without <br />existing or planned transit stations. <br /> <br />Despite some objections, the HMC recommends that transit be used as a direct factor. This <br />was due, in part, to the expectation that impacts of the policy assumptions in Projections will <br />not begin to take effect until 20 I O. Directing growth to areas with public transit in the <br />allocation methodology would ensure that this regional policy influences development <br />patterns during the 2007-2014 RHNA period. <br /> <br />Use of these factors would address the state RHNA objectives and regional goals of <br />encouraging the use of public transit and the efficient use of transportation infrastructure. <br />Directing housing need to areas near transit would also promote infill development, as <br />existing transit stations are primarily in existing urbanized areas in the region. <br /> <br />The effect of the addition of planned transit stations in the allocation methodology is that a <br />relatively higher share of the regional allocation is given to jurisdictions that will receive <br /> <br />November 2006, Page 10 <br />