Laserfiche WebLink
<br />San Francisco Bay Area <br /> <br />Draft Regional Housing Needs Allocation, 4th Revision <br /> <br />the entire 40 percent weight for employment, as opposed to the 20 percent recommended <br />weight. <br /> <br />Existing Employment, 20 Percent <br />The location and amount of existing jobs in the region is estimated by ABAG's forecasting <br />model, as documented in Projections. Specifically, existing employment is based on: <br />I) existing regional and local job data, and 2) regional and local economic trends, <br />attractiveness of commercial/industrial locations, including labor force costs, housing prices, <br />travel costs, access to potential employees, markets, and similar businesses. <br /> <br />The inclusion of existing employment as a RHNA factor ensures that regional housing need <br />is allocated in a manner consistent with regional policies and state RHNA objectives. <br />Planning for more housing in communities with existing jobs can address historic jobs- <br />housing imbalances. More housing in existing job centers may also encourage infill and <br />efficient development patterns through higher densities in existing communities. There is also <br />the potential for reduced inter- and intra-regional vehicle miles traveled and shorter <br />commutes, as more housing would be planned in proximity to existing jobs. More housing <br />near jobs may also encourage alternative modes of travel, including walking and public <br />transportation, as most existing jobs centers in the region are also transit rich. Planning for <br />housing near existing jobs also places less development pressure on outlying areas, especially <br />in rural areas with agricultural lands and protected open space. <br /> <br />Employment Growth, 20 Percent <br />The location and amount of employment growth in the region is projected by ABAG's <br />forecasting model, as documented in Projections. Specifically, employment growth is based <br />on: 1) local land use policies and plans; 2) economic trends, such as national and regional <br />industrial assumptions, attractiveness of commercial/industrial locations, including labor <br />force costs, housing prices, travel costs, access to potential employees, markets, and similar <br />businesses; and 3) regional policy. <br /> <br />Inclusion of local land use policies and plans and economic trends in ABAG's employment <br />growth forecast ensures that the use of employment growth as a RHNA factor is consistent <br />with local policies, plans, and local capacity for job growth. Employment growtb in <br />Projections considers all the land protection and growth policies, physical constraints, and the <br />employment-related factors identified by the state and the HMC for inclusion in the allocation <br />methodology, including existing jobs centers, home-based businesses, employed residents, <br />housing prices, household income and employment at private universities, and campuses of <br />the California State University and the University of California. <br /> <br />The inclusion of employment growth as a RHNA factor ensures that the regional housing <br />need is allocated to areas where job growth is forecasted to occur during the RHNA period. <br />These areas would have the responsibility of providing housing for the additional jobs that <br />are added to the region. These areas are typically served by the region's transit infrastructure. <br />Matching housing to jobs would still have the potential for reducing vehicle miles traveled <br />and encouraging alternative modes of travel. This employment factor would place housing in <br />existing communities, but would place less of the housing in the most urbanized cities in the <br />region. <br /> <br />As with household growth, inclusion of regional policies in ABAG's Projections ensures that <br />the use of employment growth as a RHNA factor is consistent with both state and regional <br />polices regarding growth, infill development, and efficient use of land. This is because <br /> <br />November 2006, Page 9 <br />