My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 11:57:11 AM
Creation date
1/11/2007 3:26:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />San Francisco Bay Area <br /> <br />Draft Regional Housing Needs Allocation, 4th Revision <br /> <br />Several of the possible allocation factors proposed in the surveys were considered by the <br />HMC, but not explicitly incorporated in the draft methodology. These factors include those <br />related to: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Jobs-housing balance: I(a) - (c) <br />Sewer/water constraints: 2 <br />City-centered development: 5(a) - (c) <br />Loss of assisted housing units: 6 <br />High housing cost burdens: 7 <br />Housing needs of farm workers: 8 <br />Traffic congestion: 9(a) <br />Rewards for past RHNA performance: 9(b) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The HMC has included the following suggested RHNA factors as explicit components of the <br />draft methodology but may not have used them in precisely the way suggested by the <br />respondents: <br /> <br />. Public transit/transportation infrastructure: 3 <br /> <br />The HMC did not consider 9( c). <br /> <br />In each instance where a respondent described specific localized data in support of its <br />response to a survey question, e.g., 2, 6(a) and 8(a), the respondent did not identifY sources <br />for comparable data for other jurisdictions. Therefore, staff could not conclude that the <br />proffered factor met the statutory requirement for comparability and availability. <br />Consequently, the proposed factor was not used. <br /> <br />IV. Housing Methodology Committee <br /> <br />As the region's Council of Governments, ABAG is responsible for allocating the state- <br />determined regional housing need to all jurisdictions in the Bay Area. The HMC was established <br />in May 2006 to assist staff in developing a recommended methodology for allocating the regional <br />need for adoption by the ABAG Executive Board. The HMC was comprised of local elected <br />officials, city and county staff, and stakeholder representatives from each county in the region. It <br />includes members from each county so that it adequately represents the entire region. <br /> <br />The members of the Housing Methodology Committee were: <br /> <br />Barbara Kondylis, Supervisor, District I (Solano), ABAG Executive Board <br />Scott Haggerty, Supervisor, District I (Alameda), ABAG Executive Board <br />Jerffery Levine, Housing Department, City of Oakland, Alameda <br />Jennifer Hosterman, Mayor, City of Pleasant on, Alameda <br />Dan Marks, Director of Planning & Development, City of Berkeley, Alameda <br />Julie Pierce, Council Member, City of Clayton, Contra Costa <br />Phillip Woods, Principal Planner, City of Concord, Contra Costa <br />Gwen Regalia, Council Member, City of Walnut Creek, Contra Costa <br />Linda Jackson, Principal Planner, City of San Rafael, Marin <br />Paul Kermoyan, Community Development Dir., City of Sa usa lito, Marin <br /> <br />November 2006, Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.