My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 12:07:47 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 3:15:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />John Miller Architects, Saint Elizabeth Seton Church <br />Tree Report. June 2006 <br /> <br />HortScience. Inc. <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />. Invasiveness <br />Trees with the potential to invade native habitats, reproduce rapidly, and grow in sub- <br />optimal environments are considered invasive. Species with these qualities may alter <br />the functional and aesthetic qualities of the habitats they invade. <br /> <br />Each tree was rated for suitability for preservation based upon its age, health, structural <br />condition and ability to safely coexist within a development environment (Table 2). <br /> <br />We consider trees with good suitability for preservation to be the best candidates for <br />preservation. We do not recommend retention of trees with low suitability for preservation in <br />areas where people or property will be present. Retention of trees with moderate suitability <br />for preservation depends upon the intensity of proposed site changes. <br /> <br />Table 2: Tree Suitability for Preservation <br /> <br />Good <br /> <br />These are trees with good health and structural stability that have the <br />potential for longevity at the site. Ten (10) trees were of good suitability <br />for preservation. <br /> <br />Tree No. Species Diameter <br /> (in.) <br />171 Deodar cedar 6 <br />172 Deodar cedar 6 <br />173 Deodar cedar 6 <br />174 Deodar cedar 6 <br />175 London plane 6 <br />176 London plane 6 <br />177 Deodar cedar 6 <br />178 Deodar cedar 7 <br />179 Deodar cedar 6 <br />180 Deodar cedar 7 <br /> <br />Moderate <br /> <br />Trees in this category have fair health and/or structural defects that may <br />be abated with treatment. Trees in this category require more intense <br />management and monitoring. and may have shorter life-spans than <br />those in the "good" category. One (1) tree was of moderate suitability for <br />preservation. <br /> <br />Tree No. <br /> <br />Species <br /> <br />Diameter <br />(in.) <br />26.22,14 <br /> <br />182 <br /> <br />Calif. black walnut <br /> <br />Poor Trees in this category are in poor health or have significant defects in <br />structure that cannot be abated with treatment. These trees can be <br />expected to decline regardless of management. One (1) tree was of <br />poor suitability for preservation. <br /> <br />Tree No. <br /> <br />Species <br /> <br />Diameter <br />(in.) <br />27 <br /> <br />181 <br /> <br />English walnut <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.