Laserfiche WebLink
<br />conditional use permit, the applicants can be required to mitigate future problems, should they <br />arise. <br /> <br />The attached Planning Commission staff report dated November 29, 2006, provides a detailed <br />description and discussion of the proposed applications, including the issues raised at the <br />neighborhood meeting, site plan and building placement, architecture/design, Green Building, <br />noise, traffic/circulation, parking, grading/drainage, landscaping, tree removal and mitigation, <br />and the variance findings. This report includes supplemental discussion regarding the issues <br />raised in the appellants' letter of appeal. <br /> <br />Traffic and Parking <br /> <br />The appellants are concerned with church members parking on the public streets in their <br />neighborhood. Staff believes that there would be adequate on-site parking at the church to <br />accommodate the proposed activities in the parish center. Also, the proposed activities in the <br />parish center building would be scheduled such that no major events would occur simultaneously <br />in the sanctuary/chapel and proposed parish center building. However, the church acknowledges <br />that some of the existing Sunday services, particularly the popular 6:30 p.m. Sunday service, <br />have been creating overflow parking in some of the adjacent neighborhood streets and Rheem <br />Drive businesses' parking lots. Consequently, staff and the church have worked together to <br />provide additional parking for the church's Sunday services and minimize chances of <br />parishioners parking in the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses. For instance, the church <br />obtained permission to use the 95-space parking lot at the adjacent 2174-2186 Rheem Drive <br />office/light industrial property from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Sundays. A condition requires the <br />church obtain another suitable off-site parking area for overflow parking or construct an on-site <br />gravel parking lot on the undeveloped eastern side of the church site should this parking <br />agreement ever be terminated. The church will also be restriping/signing the Stoneridge Drive <br />frontage in front of its property to allow on-street parking on Sundays from 3:30 p.m. to 8:00 <br />p.m. Establishing the limited time parking zone on Stoneridge Drive must be approved <br />separately by Council resolution, which has been included with this report for action. On-street <br />parking is also available along the church's Rheem Drive frontage. Conditions also require that <br />the church regularly inform its members to not park in front of the adjacent residential <br />neighborhoods or the off-street parking spaces in the light industrial/office developments along <br />Rheem Drive (except as allowed by the parking agreement) and to install a few temporary signs <br />on Rheem Drive during Sunday services requesting church members not to park in front of <br />residences. The church will also install a fence in its southern planter area near the Bowen Street <br />and Alexander Way intersection to address the neighbors' complaint that some church members <br />park along the Pleasanton Village streets and then use this "short cut" to reach the church. <br /> <br />The appellants believe that it would be unsafe for church members to walk across Rheem Drive <br />to use the parking lot at 2174-2186 Rheem Drive since there isn't a crosswalk or stop sign. The <br />City Traffic Engineer indicated that this situation is similar to neighborhood collector streets <br /> <br />SR:07:003 <br />Page 5 <br />