My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
25B
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
25B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2007 2:56:14 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 2:56:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
25B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Direct Purchase of Electrical and Control Equipment for the Vineyard Corridor Water Booster <br />Pump Station <br /> <br />The following provides an explanation as to why staff has recommended that the City procure <br />and supply electrical and control equipment for the Vineyard Corridor Water Booster Pump <br />Station, which will be installed by the pump station contractor. <br /> <br />On December 19, 2006, Council rejected bids for the City's Sewer Pump Station S-5 <br />construction project. The project was formally bid, but only three bids were received. The <br />three bids ranged from $1,763,000 to $2,096,000, compared to the consulting engineer's <br />estimate of $1,000,000. Following a detailed review of these bids and a subsequent meeting <br />with the apparent low bidder, staff became aware that there was a premium being paid on the <br />supply and installation for electrical switchgear and controls in the current construction <br />market. This was partially due to the demand for these products in comparison to the current <br />supply. This became apparent in the S-5 pump station bid whereby the electrical and control <br />portion of the work (materials and installation) was estimated at approximately $300,000 and <br />the actual bids for this portion of the work was closer to $700,000. <br /> <br />As a result of this bid for the S-5 Pump Station and the information regarding the electrical <br />and control instrumentation bidding market climate, staff began working with the City's <br />prime design consultant and electrical sub-consultant for the VCSP Water Booster Pump <br />Station to determine ways to limit paying this premium on this new pump station. The <br />conclusion to this effort was the recommendation by the electrical sub-consultant for the City <br />to directly purchase and supply the electrical, control and water testing components for this <br />new pump station from known manufacturers of this equipment and then provide this <br />equipment to the successful low bidder on the pump station project for installation. While this <br />recommendation does add some minor complexity and risk back to the City, from all <br />indications and estimates City staff received prior and at the pump station bid, packaging the <br />bid proposal for the pump station with the City supplying the aforementioned equipment <br />appears to have saved the City a minimum of $100,000. These savings are due in part to <br />minimizing the dual markup on this equipment by the pump station's electrical subcontractor <br />and the prime contractor for this portion of the work. Hence, staff is recommending that <br />Council approve the direct purchase of this equipment based upon the City's purchasing <br />guidelines from reputable manufacturers, for a total amount not-to-exceed $220,000. <br /> <br />Pump Station Landscaping <br /> <br />During the bid period for the booster pump station, staff became aware that the pump station <br />plans and specifications were not adequate to protect the existing landscaping and irrigation <br />systems at the site (existing landscaping surrounding Fire Station No.5) both during <br /> <br />Page 6 of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.