My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 12:01:47 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 1:27:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />fees for which the only changes are basic inflationary changes. This directive is not <br />intended to preclude departments bringing forth recommended adjustments at other times <br />if State law or other circumstances make mid-year changes appropriate. <br /> <br />2. Finance Director annual report to Manager/Council. <br /> <br />The Finance Director shall review the proposed fee changes and/or additions or deletions <br />suggested by each department and report to the Manager and Council as part of the <br />annual budget cycle on proposed changes. At this time, the Finance Director shall <br />propose across the board adjustments to fees for City salary increases and other <br />inflationary impacts. <br /> <br />3. Periodic review of overhead cost allocations. <br /> <br />Every five years the Finance Director shall analyze or cause to be analyzed the overhead <br />and departmental management costs allocated to each fee. <br /> <br />4. Annual master fee schedule adiustment. <br /> <br />To facilitate annual adjustment, the City shall annually adopt a new master fee schedule. <br />The City Attorney shall propose any new fee ordinances in a manner consistent with this <br />intent, and revise any ordinances existing requiring such adjustment so that the amount of <br />the fees can be changed with a single new resolution each year. <br /> <br />D. DAMAGE REIMBURSEMENT <br /> <br />I. Overall basis for charges. <br /> <br />The City will charge the person who has damaged, destroyed, or taken City property for <br />the cost to the City to process the incident and to replace that item or items with a <br />comparable new item which conforms to current City policies for the purpose the item <br />serves, or to repair the item to a state comparable to its state at the time of the incident. <br />Where the item damaged, destroyed, etc. was a vehicle, the City charges will not exceed <br />the cost to replace the vehicle with a comparable vehicle of similar capabilities and use, <br />plus its processing costs. All costs incurred by the City shall be included in the time and <br />materials charged to the perpetrator, including time to determine the nature and extent of <br />the problem, time to determine the most effective way to restore the previous situation, <br />time to handle the parties involved, court costs and time if needed, staff report <br />preparation time, and the reasonable costs allocated to these direct expenses to cover their <br />pro-rata share of direct supervision, management, support facilities, equipment used in <br />the repair, the general City overhead. <br /> <br />2. Costs of items acquired or installed to replace damaged propertv. <br /> <br />The actual hydrant, lamp post, sign or signpost, or other item acquired or installed should <br />be charged to the claim. This cost should be determined by the actual out-of-pocket cost <br />if purchased for this specific repair or the replacement cost value if taken out of storage. <br />If the replacement is an upgrade from the item which was damaged, the charge should <br />only be for the cost of the comparable item with two exceptions. First, if the only readily <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.